- Home
- All Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- What is Personal Injury?
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
- Can I Handle My Own Case?
- How Personal Injury Claims Work
- How Our Attorneys Can Help
- Denied Insurance Claims
- Personal Injury Damages
- Premises Liability
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorney
- Types of Personal Injury
- Burn Injuries
- What is a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
- San Antonio Injury Attorney
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Mediating a Personal Injury Case
- The Victim's Duty to Mitigate Damages
- San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyers
- Preponderance of Evidence
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorneys
- Proving Proximate Cause
- San Antonio Law Firms
- The Thin Skull Rule
- San Antonio Injury Lawyer
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- San Antonio Injury Law Firm
- Vicarious Liability
- Personal Injury Attorneys in San Antonio
- Subrogation
- Personal Injury Lawyers in San Antonio
- San Antonio Injury Lawyers
- New Braunfels Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death
- Texas Wrongful Death Law Explained
- Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations
- The Benefits of a Wrongful Death Attorney
- Auto Accident Wrongful Death
- Semi Truck Accident Wrongful Death
- Wrongful Deaths on the Job
- Construction Accident Wrongful Death
- Loss of Future Earnings Compensation
- Texas Wrongful Death Lawyer
- New Braunfels Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Big Rig Accidents
- Texas Truck Accident Attorney
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents
- 18-Wheeler Accident Litigation
- Truck Accident Claims
- Insurance Company Tactics
- Fatal Big Rig Accidents
- Dump Truck Accidents
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Falling Cargo Accidents
- Causes of 18-Wheeler Accidents
- San Antonio 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Truck Accident Lawyers
- San Antonio Truck Accident Attorney
- Unsafe Trucking Practices
- San Antonio Trucking Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Texas Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Texas Truck Accident Lawyer
- San Antonio Truck Accident Firm
- New Braunfels 18-Wheeler Attorney
- New Braunfels Truck Accident Lawyer
- Automobile Accidents
- San Antonio Auto Accident Lawyer
- Common Car Accident Injuries
- How To File an Accident Injury Claim
- San Antonio Car Accident Lawyer
- Child Injuries in a Car Accident
- Passenger Injuries
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance
- Proportionate Responsibility
- Tire Defect Accidents
- San Antonio Rollover Accident Attorney
- The Benefit of Hiring An Attorney
- Challenges Recovering Compensation
- Auto Accident Attorney in San Antonio
- San Antonio Accident Injury Lawyer
- San Antonio Auto Injury Attorney
- Uninsured Motorist Accidents
- San Antonio Accident Attorney
- What To Do After an Accident
- San Antonio Car Wreck Lawyer
- New Braunfels Car Accident Lawyer
- Work Related Accidents
- San Antonio Workers' Comp Lawyer
- Workers Comp Vs Non-Subscriber
- Fatal Workplace Accidents
- Gas & Oil Drilling Accidents
- Lifting Injuries While Working
- Non-Subscriber Injury Law
- What To Expect After a Work Injury
- Oilfield Worker Injury Accidents
- San Antonio Workers Compensation Attorney
- New Braunfels Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Drunk Driver Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Dangerous & Defective Products
- Drowning Accidents
- Day Care Abuse
- Medical Malpractice
- What is Medical Malpractice?
- Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim
- Malpractice Claims & Litigation Process
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect
- Misdiagnosis & Faulure to Diagnose
- Pharmacy & Prescription Errors
- Surgical Errors & Mistakes
- Nursing Malpractice
- Dental Malpractice
- Birth Injury
- San Antonio Nursing Home Abuse Attorney
- The Informed Consent Document
- Birth Injury Malpractice
- Drug & Pharmacy Injuries
- Personal Injury
- Our Attorneys
- Success Stories
- Information Center
- Contact
San Antonio Trucking Accident Attorney
Michael Grossman, Trucking Accident Attorney in San Antonio TX, Explains The Potential Challenges of Recovering Damages in an 18-Wheeler Accident Case

The damages caused by an 18 wheeler accident can be overwhelming. Unfortunately, the legal opposition a victim might face in attempting to secure compensation for such an accident can be equally immense.
However, you don't have to fight this legal battle alone. San Antonio trucking accident attorney Michael Grossman of Grossman Law Offices is here to help you. Whether you need someone to fight for your rights in a courtroom, or you just need someone to answer any questions you might have regarding your semi-truck accident. Grossman Law Offices is here for you.
First, it should be noted that there has seldom, if ever, been an 18-wheeler accident case that was won by a self-represented plaintiff. There are simply too many laws at play, often too many defendants, and too many technical facets of the court proceedings that must be closely adhered to, that even an inexperienced attorney stands little to no chance at recovering full and fair compensation for their client. With such a sizable sum of compensation likely on the line, choosing to self-represent, or simply randomly picking an attorney who may not have the necessary experience, is an awfully risky decision. By enlisting the help of an experienced San Antonio trucking accident attorney, you will likely be taking the first step towards seeing compensation for your injury or loss as a result of an 18-wheeler accident.
Vicarious Liability in 18-Wheeler Accident Cases
In many accidents involving semi-trucks, there will most likely be multiple liable parties. This means that, unlike otherwise “normal” passenger-vehicle only accidents in which only one party is likely at fault, a trucking accident can often involve multiple parties that all share some of the liability for the accident’s occurrence. The truck driver will be a liable party, but the truck driver’s employer can also be a liable party. In Texas, due to the legal notion of “respondeat superior,” an employer is held responsible for their employees’ negligent behavior. In other words, a trucking employer can be an additional defendant in a trucking accident personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. However, the trucking company will likely be carrying an expensive insurance policy, which causes further challenges in such cases, and will be discussed in further detail below.

Furthermore, depending on the specifics of the accident, other liable parties may also be defendants. If faulty brakes were to blame for the semi-truck accident, the manufacturer of the brakes could be held liable. If a load shifted in the tractor-trailer, causing the wreck, then an outside cargo-loading company could be held liable. If the semi-truck crashed into an overpass as a result of following a prescribed route that was planned by an outside route-planning company, that company could be held liable. As you can see, there can often be many more liable parties that were part of the accident before the accident occurred. Without experienced legal help like San Antonio trucking accident attorney Michael Grossman to conduct a thorough independent investigation into the accident on your behalf, all liable parties may not be identified. This would consequently mean that the compensation likely awarded to you would be less than fair if all of the liable parties are properly identified. Furthermore, when multiple defendants are involved in an 18-wheeler accident case, an attorney will often be required to tailor specific cases against each unique defendant. Our attorneys at Grossman Law Offices have twenty years of experience in litigating 18-wheeler cases.
Legal Opposition You Will Face
Legal opposition in these types of cases is often quite stout and can come from many fronts. Why is this often the case, and quite opposite of what is experienced in passenger-vehicle only accidents? A majority of the challenges in seeking compensation as a result of an injury or loss because of an 18-wheeler accident stems from the fact that a trucking company will most often be carrying a high-dollar insurance policy on their trucks and drivers.
High-Dollar Trucking Insurance Policies
Insurance companies that hold policies for trucking companies have a lot of money on the line in a truck accident due to massive commercial insurance policies. Within moments of a crash occurring, a team of insurance adjusters, defense attorneys, and accident recreation specialists will be on their way to the scene of an 18-wheeler accident. This team has a single purpose: to build up evidence to use against you in court. They will be looking for anything, like physical evidence, truck logs, witness statements, etc. in order to get their client off the hook.
High-Ranking Insurance Adjusters
Insurance adjusters that work semi-truck accident claims will often be some of the most experienced and high-ranking adjusters in their company. They have risen to their privileged and likely well-paid position by being able to do one thing well: saving their company as much money as possible. This is most often done by working to see large sum insurance claims denied or severely lessened. With their years of experience in seeing such claims denied, they will employ specific tactics in order to get a victim to admit to some, or even all, of the blame for an accident. In doing so, they can stand to save their company a sizable sum. By enlisting our help, you will be fighting their experience with our own experience. We’re familiar with their tactics, and will work your accident claim with your best interests in mind. Additionally, it should be noted that we’ve brought cases against every major insurer in the country, and they are often prone to settling out-of-court with our clients instead of meeting our lawyers in court. In other words, our reputation can go to work for you.
Fast-Acting, Savvy Defense Attorneys
Furthermore, trucking insurance companies will have defense attorneys on call that can quickly respond to the scene of an 18-wheeler accident. They will begin building a case as quickly as possible against you, seeking to make quick work of your claim. By contacting Grossman Law Offices, you can also have a quickly responding team of investigative experts that will look into your accident scene when necessary in order to discover the truth of what occurred and to assess all liable parties. San Antonio trucking accident attorney Michael Grossman and his team at Grossman Law Offices are capable of performing thorough investigations so that all liable parties are held accountable for their negligent behavior.
Additionally, defense attorneys will often use the legal overlap that exists between state and federal laws created by the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration. This legal gray area allows a savvy defense attorney to potentially circumvent state laws by appealing to federal regulations or vice-versa. In other words, the legal battlefield is complex and having an experienced semi-truck accident attorney on your side can help prevent you from stepping into a minefield.
Deceitful Drivers and Truck Companies
Even the truck driver will likely be working against you. In most cases, his or her entire career is resting on the outcome of this lawsuit, so he or she might be tempted to destroy evidence or bend the truth in order to avoid taking responsibility, and the trucking company probably won't investigate too thoroughly as to whether or not this is occurring. Our investigative prowess and careful deposition techniques are often able to deduce whether or not a truck driver is lying. With 20 years of experience, we’ve heard nearly every story that a truck driver can tell.
Furthermore, some trucking companies may be self-insured. This often leads to rather unethical behavior against a victim when the victim is seeking compensation for an injury or loss. Because the company does not carry a traditional insurance policy, they do not have to hold themselves to the same standards and regulations as a traditional insurer. As such, they often mistakenly believe that they can get away with such behavior as tampering with evidence of badgering witnesses. Our law firm has often been called when a victim has already experienced this type of unethical behavior. In those instances, we have worked to pursue legal means that compel the negligent trucking company to act correctly so that an injured or bereaved victim can seek compensation on a level playing field. Often, if a victim can contact us before having to deal with such a company, the victim can save themselves from much unnecessary frustration.
San Antonio Trucking Accident Attorney Michael Grossman Can Help You

With so many forces likely working against you, you need someone like San Antonio trucking accident attorney Michael Grossman on your side. He and his team at Grossman Law Offices are familiar with the many challenges that often arise in trucking accident cases. As mentioned before, our clients are often offered out-of-court settlements, which means that they’re able to get through the legal process more quickly and see compensation more quickly than if a trial case is required. However, our attorneys will work your case from the outset as if the case were headed to trial. In other words, we’re well-prepared to take your case to court when necessary.
Our experienced Texas attorneys can help even the odds. We have twenty years of experience, and we are meticulous in our examinations. We will examine your case from every possible angle and make sure you completely understand the options available to you so that you can make an informed decision. Trucking companies know who we are and know about our successful track record with these types of cases. In many situations, they will often agree to a favorable settlement to avoid facing our attorneys in trial, which means you get to get on with your life that much sooner. If you or someone you love has been hurt in an 18 wheeler accident, contact the San Antonio trucking accident attorneys at Grossman Law Offices, and make sure you and your family get the compensation you deserve.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.
The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.
Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$78,000.00
$78,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$370.00
$370.00
$75,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for worker who suffered soft tissue injuries when his fork lift was struck by a delivery truck.
Recovery for worker who suffered soft tissue injuries when his fork lift was struck by a delivery truck.
Total Recovery:
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$350.00
$350.00
$90,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries and Leg Contusions)
Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back injuries and leg contusions in an 18-wheeler accident.
Recovered for client who suffered soft-tissue back injuries and leg contusions in an 18-wheeler accident.
Total Recovery:
$90,000.00
$90,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$562.00
$562.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
A delivery driver hired our firm to pursue a negligent trucking company following a collision with insecure cargo. Our client was driving his work vehicle when numerous large metal pipes fell from the back of a flatbed trailer onto the roadway. Our client took evasive action but was unable to avoid the debris, which resulted in a fairly severe accident. As a result, our client sustained lower back injuries including two herniated discs which required surgery to correct. The defendants conceded liability early on but would not make a reasonable settlement offer. As such, suit was filed and the case was ultimately successfully resolved through litigation.
A delivery driver hired our firm to pursue a negligent trucking company following a collision with insecure cargo. Our client was driving his work vehicle when numerous large metal pipes fell from the back of a flatbed trailer onto the roadway. Our client took evasive action but was unable to avoid the debris, which resulted in a fairly severe accident. As a result, our client sustained lower back injuries including two herniated discs which required surgery to correct. The defendants conceded liability early on but would not make a reasonable settlement offer. As such, suit was filed and the case was ultimately successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$120,000.00
$120,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$75,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Back Injuries)
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue back injuries when he was rear ended by a delivery truck.
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue back injuries when he was rear ended by a delivery truck.
Total Recovery:
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$100.00
$2,000,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
The family of a deceased woman hired our firm following a fatal 18-wheeler accident. The fatal accident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered out of his lane, resulting in a massive collision. The decedent, a passenger in a vehicle, died on the scene.
Her adult children consulted our firm to initially investigate the accident and make sense of the facts and circumstances since the family felt that the police report did not make it clear enough precisely what occurred. We launched a full investigation an immediately deposed the investigating officers.
Upon the completion of our investigation, it was apparent that the trucking company was indeed negligent and a lawsuit was soon filed. The defendant's launched an aggressive defense whereby they initially claimed that the truck driver was overcome by his passenger who allegedly grabbed the steering wheel and deliberately drove the truck off the road, despite the truck driver's best efforts.
We refuted this claim by illustrating that the tire marks that were present clearly show the truck gradually moving across the road and eventually onto the grass, which is entirely inconsistent with an abrupt lane change caused by someone taking control of the wheel. It was quite an unusual defense strategy that we were frankly surprised to even find ourselves having to refute.
The defendants then argued that a tire blowout may have contributed to the accident, which is significant because it would enable the defendant to offset some portion of their liability to a tire manufacturer or installer. Through deposition testimony of the investigating officer we established that there was absolutely no indication at the scene of the accident that a tire had blown out.
Finally, the defendants argued that the company which loaded the trailer may have improperly loaded the cargo. This argument was most plausible considering that the precise cause of the decedent's death was that she was essentially pummeled by cargo that broke through trailer and struck her person.
Our firm consulted several experts in the fields of heavy cargo transportation and physics. Our experts felt that the cargo was secured in a manner that is perfectly consistent with industry standards and that due to the forces involved, the cargo would not have behaved any differently irrespective of how it was secured. In short, the collision caused the cargo to break free and the negligence lay squarely on the trucking company and not any other entity. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
The family of a deceased woman hired our firm following a fatal 18-wheeler accident. The fatal accident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered out of his lane, resulting in a massive collision. The decedent, a passenger in a vehicle, died on the scene.
Her adult children consulted our firm to initially investigate the accident and make sense of the facts and circumstances since the family felt that the police report did not make it clear enough precisely what occurred. We launched a full investigation an immediately deposed the investigating officers.
Upon the completion of our investigation, it was apparent that the trucking company was indeed negligent and a lawsuit was soon filed. The defendant's launched an aggressive defense whereby they initially claimed that the truck driver was overcome by his passenger who allegedly grabbed the steering wheel and deliberately drove the truck off the road, despite the truck driver's best efforts.
We refuted this claim by illustrating that the tire marks that were present clearly show the truck gradually moving across the road and eventually onto the grass, which is entirely inconsistent with an abrupt lane change caused by someone taking control of the wheel. It was quite an unusual defense strategy that we were frankly surprised to even find ourselves having to refute.
The defendants then argued that a tire blowout may have contributed to the accident, which is significant because it would enable the defendant to offset some portion of their liability to a tire manufacturer or installer. Through deposition testimony of the investigating officer we established that there was absolutely no indication at the scene of the accident that a tire had blown out.
Finally, the defendants argued that the company which loaded the trailer may have improperly loaded the cargo. This argument was most plausible considering that the precise cause of the decedent's death was that she was essentially pummeled by cargo that broke through trailer and struck her person.
Our firm consulted several experts in the fields of heavy cargo transportation and physics. Our experts felt that the cargo was secured in a manner that is perfectly consistent with industry standards and that due to the forces involved, the cargo would not have behaved any differently irrespective of how it was secured. In short, the collision caused the cargo to break free and the negligence lay squarely on the trucking company and not any other entity. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$2,000,000.00
$2,000,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$775,000.00
$775,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$350,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our client, a middle-aged woman, was injured when an 18-wheeler rear-ended her vehicle. As a consequence of the wreck, she sustained a back injury which required surgery to remedy. Naturally, the defendants denied liability and argued that the accident was unavoidable. Our attorneys filed suit. The defendant driver initially claimed that our client suddenly changed lanes in front of his tractor-trailer and then inexplicably slammed onto her brakes. When confronted with eye-witness testimony and other physical evidence that reflected an entirely different scenario, the truck driver ultimately recanted. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Our client, a middle-aged woman, was injured when an 18-wheeler rear-ended her vehicle. As a consequence of the wreck, she sustained a back injury which required surgery to remedy. Naturally, the defendants denied liability and argued that the accident was unavoidable. Our attorneys filed suit. The defendant driver initially claimed that our client suddenly changed lanes in front of his tractor-trailer and then inexplicably slammed onto her brakes. When confronted with eye-witness testimony and other physical evidence that reflected an entirely different scenario, the truck driver ultimately recanted. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$140,000.00
$140,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$8,188.00
$8,188.00
$41,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue injuries when she was struck by an 18-wheeler.
Recovery for client who suffered soft tissue injuries when she was struck by an 18-wheeler.
Total Recovery:
$41,000.00
$41,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$13,666.00
$13,666.00
Litigation Expenses:
$135.00
$135.00
$875,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Plaintiff suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when her car was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler. The defendants argued that the accident was unavoidable, thus denying liability. Litigation commenced and the case was satisfactorily resolved soon thereafter.
Plaintiff suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when her car was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler. The defendants argued that the accident was unavoidable, thus denying liability. Litigation commenced and the case was satisfactorily resolved soon thereafter.
Total Recovery:
$875,000.00
$875,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$288,750.00
$288,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$41,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovered for client suffered soft-tissue injuries when her car was side-swiped by a dump truck.
Recovered for client suffered soft-tissue injuries when her car was side-swiped by a dump truck.
Total Recovery:
$41,000.00
$41,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$13,666.00
$13,666.00
Litigation Expenses:
$50.00
$50.00



