- Home
- All Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- What is Personal Injury?
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
- Can I Handle My Own Case?
- How Personal Injury Claims Work
- How Our Attorneys Can Help
- Denied Insurance Claims
- Personal Injury Damages
- Premises Liability
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorney
- Types of Personal Injury
- Burn Injuries
- What is a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
- San Antonio Injury Attorney
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Mediating a Personal Injury Case
- The Victim's Duty to Mitigate Damages
- San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyers
- Preponderance of Evidence
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorneys
- Proving Proximate Cause
- San Antonio Law Firms
- The Thin Skull Rule
- San Antonio Injury Lawyer
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- San Antonio Injury Law Firm
- Vicarious Liability
- Personal Injury Attorneys in San Antonio
- Subrogation
- Personal Injury Lawyers in San Antonio
- San Antonio Injury Lawyers
- New Braunfels Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death
- Texas Wrongful Death Law Explained
- Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations
- The Benefits of a Wrongful Death Attorney
- Auto Accident Wrongful Death
- Semi Truck Accident Wrongful Death
- Wrongful Deaths on the Job
- Construction Accident Wrongful Death
- Loss of Future Earnings Compensation
- Texas Wrongful Death Lawyer
- New Braunfels Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Big Rig Accidents
- Texas Truck Accident Attorney
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents
- 18-Wheeler Accident Litigation
- Truck Accident Claims
- Insurance Company Tactics
- Fatal Big Rig Accidents
- Dump Truck Accidents
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Falling Cargo Accidents
- Causes of 18-Wheeler Accidents
- San Antonio 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Truck Accident Lawyers
- San Antonio Truck Accident Attorney
- Unsafe Trucking Practices
- San Antonio Trucking Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Texas Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Texas Truck Accident Lawyer
- San Antonio Truck Accident Firm
- New Braunfels 18-Wheeler Attorney
- New Braunfels Truck Accident Lawyer
- Automobile Accidents
- San Antonio Auto Accident Lawyer
- Common Car Accident Injuries
- How To File an Accident Injury Claim
- San Antonio Car Accident Lawyer
- Child Injuries in a Car Accident
- Passenger Injuries
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance
- Proportionate Responsibility
- Tire Defect Accidents
- San Antonio Rollover Accident Attorney
- The Benefit of Hiring An Attorney
- Challenges Recovering Compensation
- Auto Accident Attorney in San Antonio
- San Antonio Accident Injury Lawyer
- San Antonio Auto Injury Attorney
- Uninsured Motorist Accidents
- San Antonio Accident Attorney
- What To Do After an Accident
- San Antonio Car Wreck Lawyer
- New Braunfels Car Accident Lawyer
- Work Related Accidents
- San Antonio Workers' Comp Lawyer
- Workers Comp Vs Non-Subscriber
- Fatal Workplace Accidents
- Gas & Oil Drilling Accidents
- Lifting Injuries While Working
- Non-Subscriber Injury Law
- What To Expect After a Work Injury
- Oilfield Worker Injury Accidents
- San Antonio Workers Compensation Attorney
- New Braunfels Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Drunk Driver Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Dangerous & Defective Products
- Drowning Accidents
- Day Care Abuse
- Medical Malpractice
- What is Medical Malpractice?
- Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim
- Malpractice Claims & Litigation Process
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect
- Misdiagnosis & Faulure to Diagnose
- Pharmacy & Prescription Errors
- Surgical Errors & Mistakes
- Nursing Malpractice
- Dental Malpractice
- Birth Injury
- San Antonio Nursing Home Abuse Attorney
- The Informed Consent Document
- Birth Injury Malpractice
- Drug & Pharmacy Injuries
- Personal Injury
- Our Attorneys
- Success Stories
- Information Center
- Contact
San Antonio Drunk Driver Accidents
San Antonio, Texas auto accident attorney Michael Grossman discusses the legal ramifications of accidents that involve a drunk driver
- Texas Dram Shop Law
- When Can A Bar or Establishment Be Held Liable?
- Jury Misconceptions
- An Experienced Defense Counsel
- Ruthless Insurance Companies

Being hurt by a drunken driver is often a devastating experience, and victims rightly want to seek justice after such an accident. Furthermore, intoxicated driver accidents often cause serious injury, and require a victim to spend a significant amount of time away from work.
The financial burdens associated with these accidents can be overwhelming. Victims deserve to be compensated for these expenses. Unfortunately, however, filing a drunk driving accident lawsuit is a complex process. Experienced San Antonio drunk driver accident attorney Michael Grossman is here to tell you what you will be up against and how Grossman Law Offices can help you.
Texas Dram Shop Law
Prior to the Texas Dram Shop Act, when a victim was hurt by a drunken driver, his or her only option for seeking compensation was to sue the driver. No one else could (generally) be held liable for the intoxicated driver’s actions. This created a system wherein bars, restaurants, and other establishments did not usually care about public safety. All in the name of profits, bars would serve an individual as much alcohol as that person wanted. That person would then leave the bar and pose a serious risk to other people, especially if that person got behind the wheel of a vehicle. In other words, bars’ interests were at odds with the safety of other people.
In order to combat this discrepancy, legislators enacted the Texas Dram Shop Act. This act is designed to hold bars and establishments liable for the actions of their patrons under specific circumstances. This serves, not only to provide additional means of compensation for victims of drunk drivers, but also to dissuade bars and restaurants from serving patrons to the point of intoxication.
When Exactly Can A Bar or Other Establishment Be Held Liable?
Bars and restaurants must apply for a license to serve alcohol. An alcohol license is contingent on the existence of certain safety procedures. For example, a bar must carefully regulate the amount of alcohol a patron consumes, and bars are responsible for making sure that their patrons are not served to the point of intoxication. Being drunk in public is illegal in Texas, and when bars help an individual reach the point of intoxication, they are breaking the law.
Of course, alcohol affects all people differently. Sometimes a patron may become intoxicated very quickly – more quickly than a bar’s employees expect. In these situations, the bar is responsible for ensuring that the intoxicated person leaves the bar safely. If that means calling the police to pick the drunken person up, then that is what a bar is obligated to do. If a patron walks out of the door of a bar while intoxicated, in almost all cases, that bar is breaking the law and can be held legally responsible for any damages, injuries, or deaths caused by that intoxicated patron.
Legal Obstacles You Will Face When Filing an Intoxicated Driver Accident Lawsuit
While the concept behind a drunken driver accident lawsuit may seem relatively straightforward, the truth is that these lawsuit are complex, technical matters. Without an experienced drunk driver accident lawyer on your side, you have almost no chance of securing a fair settlement. You will face four main difficulties in any drunk driver accident lawsuit: jury misconceptions, an experienced defense counsel, the third party defense, and ruthless insurance companies.
Jury Misconceptions

The real value of any civil lawsuit is whatever a jury is willing to give to a victim in terms of compensation. Any experienced lawyer can explain all of the technical and legal details surrounding their client’s case, and explain very thoroughly why their client deserves compensation. But the problem is that juries do not generally understand dram shop causes of action. In most drunk driver accidents, the drunk driver seriously injures or kills another person. That driver then goes to jail. Many juries see this as adequate punishment, and they cannot see why the drunk driver should face additional punishment – and the jury certainly does not understand why the bar should be punished for the drunken individual’s actions.
The problem is that the drunk driver going to jail does nothing to compensation the victim for the serious injuries he or she might have received. In addition, most juries do not realize that bars often act so contrary to public safety and deserve to be punished for that negligence. But our experienced San Antonio lawyers can speak the jury’s language. We know how to explain complex legal issues in ways that a jury can understand and sympathize with. In other words, we know how to convince a jury that you need compensation in order to get on with your life after this type of accident. Medical treatment and lost wages can put severe financial burdens on accident victims. Our lawyers can make sure that a jury understands this.
An Experienced Defense Counsel
Since the Texas Dram Shop Act was established, there has emerged a group of attorneys who do nothing but defend bars, restaurants, and other establishments from lawsuits. Not many attorneys are willing to handle these types of cases, but the ones that do generally do nothing but defend bars in dram shop cases. This means that they have years of extensive experience with these types of lawsuits, and they have developed intricate defense techniques. Very few people can successfully go up against these aggressive defense lawyers in court.
But our attorneys have faced every big liquor liability defense firm. We have made substantial recoveries in hundreds of cases. We are dedicated to protecting our clients from the unscrupulous defense tactics employed by these attorneys. Do not try to go up against them without experienced help.
The Third Party Defense
Most defense arguments in dram shop cases center around the driver. The defense counsel will almost undoubtedly argue that the driver was far and away the largest contributing factor to the accident, and so the bar should not be punished. But the truth is that, while the driver might be mostly to blame, the bar should not have let that driver get behind the wheel of a vehicle. Bars take on a responsibility when they accept a liquor license to ensure that this type of situation does not happen. Our lawyers will make sure that a jury sees this, and we will do everything we can to make sure that every responsible party in your accident is brought to justice.
Ruthless Insurance Companies
Behind all the defense attorney antics are the big insurance companies that cover bars and other establishments. They have one goal: to pay you the smallest settlement possible. In Texas, they have a huge advantage: no one may tell a jury that there is an insurance policy applicable in a lawsuit. This allows an insurance company to employ numerous underhanded tactics to get out of paying a settlement – and the jury will never know it. Furthermore, Texas liquor liability laws have been getting more restrictive, so insurance companies will go to court over almost any case. They are not afraid of non-attorneys, and they know that many people will not realize that they need an attorney until it is too late.

But our attorneys can scare them into offering you a fair settlement. We have faced every major insurance carrier in the country over the past 20 years, and we have successfully investigated and litigated hundreds of cases. We have experience both in litigation and in resolving cases outside of court, and we are prepared to do whatever is necessary to ensure that you receive fair compensation. Defense attorneys and insurance companies know how successful we have been, and they are often very cooperative with our attorneys so that they will not have to face us in court. In other words, we can get you back on your feet quickly with the compensation you need to get on with your life. So if you or someone you love has been involved in an accident involving an intoxicated driver, contact experienced San Antonio drunk driver accident lawyer Michael Grossman at Grossman Law Offices today, and make sure that every party responsible for your accident is brought to justice.
Use the navigation menu to the left to read about more specific drunken driver injury topics including drunk driving statistics & an explanation of Texas dram shop laws.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$350,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First Party Dram Shop
Our firm was hired by the minor child and parents of a young man who was killed in a motorcycle accident after being over served alcohol at a South Padre Island bar. The plaintiffs hired our firm to investigate the claim on the basis that the decedent was over the legal limit at the time of his death. In initial attempts to settle the case out of court, the defendants denied liability. Suit was filed soon thereafter.
The defendants initially argued that the decedent never consumed alcohol on their premises. Through physical evidence and deposition testimony to the contrary, we were able to conclusively prove that the decedent had indeed been drinking at the establishment.
The defendants then asserted allegations that the decedent's minor child was not actually his biological child, which would bar his claim entirely. A DNA test was performed and this argument was defeated.
The defendants then asserted the safe harbor defense. Our attorneys argued that the defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection due to the fact that their servers were not all licensed providers. However, while this element was being addressed, our attorneys focused their attention on addressing the second element of the safe harbor defense regarding the bar's encouragement of the over service of alcohol. The defendants claimed that they would never serve the double-shot Bacardi cocktails that witnesses claimed the decedent drank several of. We sent private investigators into the bar to order the same drinks that the decedent consumed on the night of his death and the very same bar tenders who over served the decedent, without hesitation, served copious amounts of alcohol to the investigators, all of which was captured on hidden camera.
Once the safe harbor defense was defeated, the defendants argued that the decedent's BAC was low enough at the time of his death (as recorded by the hospital) that he would not have necessarily appeared obviously intoxicated to the servers and therefore the bar should not be held liable even if he had been over served. Eyewitness testimony refuted this.
Additionally, our firm's testifying medical expert reviewed the medical records related to the emergency helicopter flight that transported the decedent to the hospital after his accident. She determined that the EMS technicians administered numerous blood transfusions while in flight. Armed with this newfound data, our medical expert reverse extrapolated and determined conclusively that the decedent's BAC was actually in the range of .19-.21 at the time of the accident, though it was drastically diluted by the time he arrived at the hospital, which accounted for the relatively low BAC found in the hospital's medical records. This testimony proved to be pivotal in the case, resulting in a successful recovery for our clients.
Our firm was hired by the minor child and parents of a young man who was killed in a motorcycle accident after being over served alcohol at a South Padre Island bar. The plaintiffs hired our firm to investigate the claim on the basis that the decedent was over the legal limit at the time of his death. In initial attempts to settle the case out of court, the defendants denied liability. Suit was filed soon thereafter.
The defendants initially argued that the decedent never consumed alcohol on their premises. Through physical evidence and deposition testimony to the contrary, we were able to conclusively prove that the decedent had indeed been drinking at the establishment.
The defendants then asserted allegations that the decedent's minor child was not actually his biological child, which would bar his claim entirely. A DNA test was performed and this argument was defeated.
The defendants then asserted the safe harbor defense. Our attorneys argued that the defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection due to the fact that their servers were not all licensed providers. However, while this element was being addressed, our attorneys focused their attention on addressing the second element of the safe harbor defense regarding the bar's encouragement of the over service of alcohol. The defendants claimed that they would never serve the double-shot Bacardi cocktails that witnesses claimed the decedent drank several of. We sent private investigators into the bar to order the same drinks that the decedent consumed on the night of his death and the very same bar tenders who over served the decedent, without hesitation, served copious amounts of alcohol to the investigators, all of which was captured on hidden camera.
Once the safe harbor defense was defeated, the defendants argued that the decedent's BAC was low enough at the time of his death (as recorded by the hospital) that he would not have necessarily appeared obviously intoxicated to the servers and therefore the bar should not be held liable even if he had been over served. Eyewitness testimony refuted this.
Additionally, our firm's testifying medical expert reviewed the medical records related to the emergency helicopter flight that transported the decedent to the hospital after his accident. She determined that the EMS technicians administered numerous blood transfusions while in flight. Armed with this newfound data, our medical expert reverse extrapolated and determined conclusively that the decedent's BAC was actually in the range of .19-.21 at the time of the accident, though it was drastically diluted by the time he arrived at the hospital, which accounted for the relatively low BAC found in the hospital's medical records. This testimony proved to be pivotal in the case, resulting in a successful recovery for our clients.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$140,000.00
$140,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Automobile Accident
(policy limits) Our firm was hired to pursue an intoxicated driver who killed an elderly school crossing guard. The fatal accident occurred as the decedent was escorting a woman and her child across the roadway through a crosswalk. The defendant then sped through the school zone, in an intoxicated a state, and struck the decedent who died on the scene.
The family hired our firm to investigate and pursue the defendant under a wrongful death cause of action. Following our investigation and preliminary vehicle inspection, our attorneys issued a Stowers' demand to the defendants. A significant factor in resolving this claim is that merely days before we submitted our demand to the defendant' insurance carrier, we won a large case against the very same insurance carrier, which was one of several such victories secured against the carrier in our firm's history. Our threats of litigation were therefore heeded and the defendants offered policy limits to settle the claim without the need to file suit.
(policy limits) Our firm was hired to pursue an intoxicated driver who killed an elderly school crossing guard. The fatal accident occurred as the decedent was escorting a woman and her child across the roadway through a crosswalk. The defendant then sped through the school zone, in an intoxicated a state, and struck the decedent who died on the scene.
The family hired our firm to investigate and pursue the defendant under a wrongful death cause of action. Following our investigation and preliminary vehicle inspection, our attorneys issued a Stowers' demand to the defendants. A significant factor in resolving this claim is that merely days before we submitted our demand to the defendant' insurance carrier, we won a large case against the very same insurance carrier, which was one of several such victories secured against the carrier in our firm's history. Our threats of litigation were therefore heeded and the defendants offered policy limits to settle the claim without the need to file suit.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$97,500.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First-Party Dram Shop Accident
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$97,500.00
$97,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,750.00
$48,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Third Party Dram Shop
(policy limits) An incredibly intoxicated driver drove head-on into a vehicle, killing several of the vehicle's occupants. The defendants had limited assets, yet an alternative policy was uncovered, which the defendants argued was non applicable. Under threat of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a settlement for the policy limits.
(policy limits) An incredibly intoxicated driver drove head-on into a vehicle, killing several of the vehicle's occupants. The defendants had limited assets, yet an alternative policy was uncovered, which the defendants argued was non applicable. Under threat of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a settlement for the policy limits.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$132,000.00
$132,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Arm)
Recovered for client injured in a liquor liability accident.
Recovered for client injured in a liquor liability accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First Party Dram Shop
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Leg)
(policy limits) Recovery for pedestrian who suffered a broken leg when he was hit by a drunken driver.
(policy limits) Recovery for pedestrian who suffered a broken leg when he was hit by a drunken driver.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$109,500.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Broken Leg)
Recovery for passenger who suffered broken leg in a drunken driving accident.
Recovery for passenger who suffered broken leg in a drunken driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$109,500.00
$109,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$41,000.00
$41,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$30.00
$30.00
$337,500.00 Recovery - Third-Party Dram Shop Accident (Punctured Colon and Soft Tissue Injuries)
Our client suffered a punctured colon and numerous soft tissue injuries in an alcohol-related car accident. The accident occurred as the defendant driver crashed his car into a concrete median. The plaintiff, a passenger in the vehicle, alleged that the defendant driver was over served alcohol to such an extent that he was several times the legal limit. As such, a claim was brought against the defendant driver and the bar which over served him. A settlement was reached with the defendant driver and the plaintiff turned his focus on the bar in question. The case was resolved successfully through litigation. Based on the egregious conduct of the bar and it's numerous TABC violations, the defendant's liquor license was revoked soon after the case was resolved.
Our client suffered a punctured colon and numerous soft tissue injuries in an alcohol-related car accident. The accident occurred as the defendant driver crashed his car into a concrete median. The plaintiff, a passenger in the vehicle, alleged that the defendant driver was over served alcohol to such an extent that he was several times the legal limit. As such, a claim was brought against the defendant driver and the bar which over served him. A settlement was reached with the defendant driver and the plaintiff turned his focus on the bar in question. The case was resolved successfully through litigation. Based on the egregious conduct of the bar and it's numerous TABC violations, the defendant's liquor license was revoked soon after the case was resolved.
Total Recovery:
$337,500.00
$337,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$134,000.00
$134,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$3,750.00
$3,750.00



