- Home
- All Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- What is Personal Injury?
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
- Can I Handle My Own Case?
- How Personal Injury Claims Work
- How Our Attorneys Can Help
- Denied Insurance Claims
- Personal Injury Damages
- Premises Liability
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorney
- Types of Personal Injury
- Burn Injuries
- What is a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
- San Antonio Injury Attorney
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Mediating a Personal Injury Case
- The Victim's Duty to Mitigate Damages
- San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyers
- Preponderance of Evidence
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorneys
- Proving Proximate Cause
- San Antonio Law Firms
- The Thin Skull Rule
- San Antonio Injury Lawyer
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- San Antonio Injury Law Firm
- Vicarious Liability
- Personal Injury Attorneys in San Antonio
- Subrogation
- Personal Injury Lawyers in San Antonio
- San Antonio Injury Lawyers
- New Braunfels Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death
- Texas Wrongful Death Law Explained
- Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations
- The Benefits of a Wrongful Death Attorney
- Auto Accident Wrongful Death
- Semi Truck Accident Wrongful Death
- Wrongful Deaths on the Job
- Construction Accident Wrongful Death
- Loss of Future Earnings Compensation
- Texas Wrongful Death Lawyer
- New Braunfels Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Big Rig Accidents
- Texas Truck Accident Attorney
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents
- 18-Wheeler Accident Litigation
- Truck Accident Claims
- Insurance Company Tactics
- Fatal Big Rig Accidents
- Dump Truck Accidents
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Falling Cargo Accidents
- Causes of 18-Wheeler Accidents
- San Antonio 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Truck Accident Lawyers
- San Antonio Truck Accident Attorney
- Unsafe Trucking Practices
- San Antonio Trucking Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Texas Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Texas Truck Accident Lawyer
- San Antonio Truck Accident Firm
- New Braunfels 18-Wheeler Attorney
- New Braunfels Truck Accident Lawyer
- Automobile Accidents
- San Antonio Auto Accident Lawyer
- Common Car Accident Injuries
- How To File an Accident Injury Claim
- San Antonio Car Accident Lawyer
- Child Injuries in a Car Accident
- Passenger Injuries
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance
- Proportionate Responsibility
- Tire Defect Accidents
- San Antonio Rollover Accident Attorney
- The Benefit of Hiring An Attorney
- Challenges Recovering Compensation
- Auto Accident Attorney in San Antonio
- San Antonio Accident Injury Lawyer
- San Antonio Auto Injury Attorney
- Uninsured Motorist Accidents
- San Antonio Accident Attorney
- What To Do After an Accident
- San Antonio Car Wreck Lawyer
- New Braunfels Car Accident Lawyer
- Work Related Accidents
- San Antonio Workers' Comp Lawyer
- Workers Comp Vs Non-Subscriber
- Fatal Workplace Accidents
- Gas & Oil Drilling Accidents
- Lifting Injuries While Working
- Non-Subscriber Injury Law
- What To Expect After a Work Injury
- Oilfield Worker Injury Accidents
- San Antonio Workers Compensation Attorney
- New Braunfels Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Drunk Driver Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Dangerous & Defective Products
- Drowning Accidents
- Day Care Abuse
- Medical Malpractice
- What is Medical Malpractice?
- Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim
- Malpractice Claims & Litigation Process
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect
- Misdiagnosis & Faulure to Diagnose
- Pharmacy & Prescription Errors
- Surgical Errors & Mistakes
- Nursing Malpractice
- Dental Malpractice
- Birth Injury
- San Antonio Nursing Home Abuse Attorney
- The Informed Consent Document
- Birth Injury Malpractice
- Drug & Pharmacy Injuries
- Personal Injury
- Our Attorneys
- Success Stories
- Information Center
- Contact
San Antonio Railroad Accidents
San Antonio Railroad Accident Attorney Michael Grossman Talks About Your Collision With a Train And Your Rights

Railway accidents are much more common than people think. Most people's image of a collision between a train and an auto is like a movie scene where a vehicle is stuck on the tracks while a train bears down on it.
Most of the time, accidents involving a serious collision between a train and an automobile is not at all like those you see on TV. In most of these cases, the collisions between trains and motor vehicles occur at night, and at crossings that are not well marked. In these circumstances, it is surprisingly easy for someone to drive directly into the side of the train if the train is not properly illuminated and the engineer does not blow his whistle.
No matter if this is what happened in your railroad accident or if the circumstances of your wreck were something different, chances are you have suffered heavy losses as a result of a collision with a train in San Antonio. Due to a train’s size and the power that trains can generate, collisions with trains normally involve devastating consequences. If you or a loved one have been injured by a train collision, you may be entitled to compensation for your loss, including recovery for lost wages, any pain and suffering involved, your loss of future earning capacity, any related medical expenses, repair costs to your car, and much more.
After a wreck involving a train, many victims wrongly believe that asserting their rights and obtaining redress for their injuries will involve a simple legal procedure identical to what follows a wreck between two ordinary cars. In fact, obtaining just compensation for your injuries after a wreck with a train is much more complicated than when you pursue an ordinary auto accident claim. Here, San Antonio railroad accident attorney Michael Grossman would like to explain the differences between lawsuits involving collisions between two cars and a collision with a railway train. He will also explain to you how the injury attorneys at Grossman Law Offices might be able to help you with your case.
Why railroad Collisions Are So Different
Being the victim of a collision with a train is not at all the same as being involved in an injury accident that involves just two cars. Collisions with trains will generally involve greater damage and injury than normal car accidents. When the injuries are more severe, your medical expenses, your repair costs and your other losses will be higher. Higher losses mean more financial responsibility of the responsible party who caused the collision. Due to the high risks and the high dollar amounts that could be involved in your case, you can expect that the defendant will fight fiercely to avoid paying for their transgressions. In the high stakes lawsuits that arise from railroad accidents, it is better to have a personal injury attorney by your side who has experience in these kinds of litigation.
The train and the train company that was involved in your accident will inevitably have insurance. Insurance policies that are carried on trains are usually worth much more than the policies that insure autos. As a result, insurance companies that carry policies on trains could lose hundreds of times more money if they lose a railroad accident lawsuit than if a defendant loses a car accident lawsuit. Consequently, train companies and their insurers are willing to spend a lot of money to defend their profits that could be affected if they have to pay out large settlements to people like you. Insurance companies use accident recreation specialists, actuarial analysts, site researchers, collision experts and attorneys qualified in defending these expensive insurance policies. All of these involved entities have the same objective to justify the denial of its claim for their losses. Professionals dealing with cases of train collision insurance are not the same type of adjusters who deal with ordinary car claims. They will have relevant, prior experience in seeing large-sum claims summarily denied against plaintiffs who do not have proper and experienced legal representation.
Another factor that makes railroad collision litigation complex is the number of often incompatible rules that state and federal agencies have made. When it comes to train regulations, you will find that federal and state laws do not always create uniform standards. This creates an ambiguous area for lawyers that defense attorneys may be able to use to their advantage. The specialist defense lawyers who defend insurers against lawsuits arising from train accidents know how to use the shadows the ambiguity creates to see claims denied and cases dismissed. When there is a regulation contrary to federal or state rules that a defense lawyer could use to their advantage, they will. Especially in case of railroad accidents, without an attorney by your side you might lose a perfectly legitimate case because of an obscure and technical legal breach.
Finally, when you bring a lawsuit for a railroad accident, you should be aware that public perception is likely to be against you because many people generally think of trains as a safe way to travel since trains usually travel in a straight line and have whistles and other warning signals. People often assume that when there’s a collision between a train and a car, that the driver of the car likely caused the collision. Naturally, this is not always the situation, but if your case goes to trial by jury, you must provide sufficient evidence to override this prejudicial presumption working against you.
San Antonio railroad Accident Attorney Michael Grossman Can Help

When there are train accidents, the victims need to take specific legal measures to protect their rights and get compensation for how they’ve been injured. An experienced lawyer is the best way to increase the chances of recovering all to which you are entitled. Grossman Law Offices’ personal injury lawyers have handled cases of railroad accidents for more than two decades. We have won judgments and settlements against almost every major insurance company in the country, and many right here in San Antonio. Consequently, insurance companies know the name of our law firm and are usually eager to settle out of court rather than risk losing against our lawyers by jury verdict.
If you have been injured because of a wreck with a train, you likely have merit in pursuing a San Antonio personal injury lawsuit. You need to trust an experienced lawyer like San Antonio railroad accident attorney Michael Grossman. Call us at 1-855-393-0000 – the call is toll free – to discuss the all of the details of your situation. When you call us, we will listen and give you free individual advice based on your legal standing. If you choose our firm to represent you and manage your litigation, we will work on a contingency basis, i.e. you will not owe us money unless we are able to help you secure compensation. With relevant experience and a respected reputation for helping injured victims, the San Antonio railroad accident attorneys at Grossman Law Offices are ready to help you seek fair compensation for your injury.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$200,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Recovery for motorcyclist who suffered a back injury in an 18-wheeler accident.
Recovery for motorcyclist who suffered a back injury in an 18-wheeler accident.
Total Recovery:
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$80,000.00
$80,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,709.00
$5,709.00
$350,000.00 Recovery - Product Liability (Back Injury Resulting in Surgery)
A young woman suffered a back injury that required corrective surgery following a boating accident. The boat in question sped out of control and crashed into a landmass, throwing our client from the boat, as the result of a stuck throttle. Upon inspection of the boat, it was determined that a poor design led to the malfunction and a product liability lawsuit was brought against the manufacturer. The defendants argued that the boat was inappropriately piloted, however, the physical evidence depicted the cause of the accident quite clearly and the case was successfully resolved.
A young woman suffered a back injury that required corrective surgery following a boating accident. The boat in question sped out of control and crashed into a landmass, throwing our client from the boat, as the result of a stuck throttle. Upon inspection of the boat, it was determined that a poor design led to the malfunction and a product liability lawsuit was brought against the manufacturer. The defendants argued that the boat was inappropriately piloted, however, the physical evidence depicted the cause of the accident quite clearly and the case was successfully resolved.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$100.00
$97,500.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First-Party Dram Shop Accident
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$97,500.00
$97,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,750.00
$48,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$93,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries and Abrasions)
Recovered for victim of motorcycle accident who suffered soft tissue injuries and abrasions.
Recovered for victim of motorcycle accident who suffered soft tissue injuries and abrasions.
Total Recovery:
$93,000.00
$93,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$31,000.00
$31,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$181.00
$181.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Neck, Back, and Knee Injury)
Recovery for a client who suffered neck, back, and knee injuries in a motor cycle accident.
Recovery for a client who suffered neck, back, and knee injuries in a motor cycle accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,333.00
$33,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$627.00
$627.00
$475,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident / Motorcycle Accident (Shoulder Injury Requiring Surgery)
An airline pilot suffered a shoulder injury resulting in surgery when he was sideswiped by an 18-wheeler. The case was resolved through litigation, as establishing liability was a contentious matter. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff made an illegal passing maneuver, but the evidence showed that the defendant made a sweeping turn and intruded upon our client's right of way.
An airline pilot suffered a shoulder injury resulting in surgery when he was sideswiped by an 18-wheeler. The case was resolved through litigation, as establishing liability was a contentious matter. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff made an illegal passing maneuver, but the evidence showed that the defendant made a sweeping turn and intruded upon our client's right of way.
Total Recovery:
$475,000.00
$475,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$158,333.00
$158,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Broken Femur)
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$350,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First Party Dram Shop
Our firm was hired by the minor child and parents of a young man who was killed in a motorcycle accident after being over served alcohol at a South Padre Island bar. The plaintiffs hired our firm to investigate the claim on the basis that the decedent was over the legal limit at the time of his death. In initial attempts to settle the case out of court, the defendants denied liability. Suit was filed soon thereafter.
The defendants initially argued that the decedent never consumed alcohol on their premises. Through physical evidence and deposition testimony to the contrary, we were able to conclusively prove that the decedent had indeed been drinking at the establishment.
The defendants then asserted allegations that the decedent's minor child was not actually his biological child, which would bar his claim entirely. A DNA test was performed and this argument was defeated.
The defendants then asserted the safe harbor defense. Our attorneys argued that the defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection due to the fact that their servers were not all licensed providers. However, while this element was being addressed, our attorneys focused their attention on addressing the second element of the safe harbor defense regarding the bar's encouragement of the over service of alcohol. The defendants claimed that they would never serve the double-shot Bacardi cocktails that witnesses claimed the decedent drank several of. We sent private investigators into the bar to order the same drinks that the decedent consumed on the night of his death and the very same bar tenders who over served the decedent, without hesitation, served copious amounts of alcohol to the investigators, all of which was captured on hidden camera.
Once the safe harbor defense was defeated, the defendants argued that the decedent's BAC was low enough at the time of his death (as recorded by the hospital) that he would not have necessarily appeared obviously intoxicated to the servers and therefore the bar should not be held liable even if he had been over served. Eyewitness testimony refuted this.
Additionally, our firm's testifying medical expert reviewed the medical records related to the emergency helicopter flight that transported the decedent to the hospital after his accident. She determined that the EMS technicians administered numerous blood transfusions while in flight. Armed with this newfound data, our medical expert reverse extrapolated and determined conclusively that the decedent's BAC was actually in the range of .19-.21 at the time of the accident, though it was drastically diluted by the time he arrived at the hospital, which accounted for the relatively low BAC found in the hospital's medical records. This testimony proved to be pivotal in the case, resulting in a successful recovery for our clients.
Our firm was hired by the minor child and parents of a young man who was killed in a motorcycle accident after being over served alcohol at a South Padre Island bar. The plaintiffs hired our firm to investigate the claim on the basis that the decedent was over the legal limit at the time of his death. In initial attempts to settle the case out of court, the defendants denied liability. Suit was filed soon thereafter.
The defendants initially argued that the decedent never consumed alcohol on their premises. Through physical evidence and deposition testimony to the contrary, we were able to conclusively prove that the decedent had indeed been drinking at the establishment.
The defendants then asserted allegations that the decedent's minor child was not actually his biological child, which would bar his claim entirely. A DNA test was performed and this argument was defeated.
The defendants then asserted the safe harbor defense. Our attorneys argued that the defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection due to the fact that their servers were not all licensed providers. However, while this element was being addressed, our attorneys focused their attention on addressing the second element of the safe harbor defense regarding the bar's encouragement of the over service of alcohol. The defendants claimed that they would never serve the double-shot Bacardi cocktails that witnesses claimed the decedent drank several of. We sent private investigators into the bar to order the same drinks that the decedent consumed on the night of his death and the very same bar tenders who over served the decedent, without hesitation, served copious amounts of alcohol to the investigators, all of which was captured on hidden camera.
Once the safe harbor defense was defeated, the defendants argued that the decedent's BAC was low enough at the time of his death (as recorded by the hospital) that he would not have necessarily appeared obviously intoxicated to the servers and therefore the bar should not be held liable even if he had been over served. Eyewitness testimony refuted this.
Additionally, our firm's testifying medical expert reviewed the medical records related to the emergency helicopter flight that transported the decedent to the hospital after his accident. She determined that the EMS technicians administered numerous blood transfusions while in flight. Armed with this newfound data, our medical expert reverse extrapolated and determined conclusively that the decedent's BAC was actually in the range of .19-.21 at the time of the accident, though it was drastically diluted by the time he arrived at the hospital, which accounted for the relatively low BAC found in the hospital's medical records. This testimony proved to be pivotal in the case, resulting in a successful recovery for our clients.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$140,000.00
$140,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$125,055.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Recovery for client who suffered a back injury resulting in surgery in a car accident.
Recovery for client who suffered a back injury resulting in surgery in a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$125,055.00
$125,055.00
Attorney Fees:
$41,684.00
$41,684.00
Litigation Expenses:
$435.00
$435.00



