- Home
- All Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- What is Personal Injury?
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
- Can I Handle My Own Case?
- How Personal Injury Claims Work
- How Our Attorneys Can Help
- Denied Insurance Claims
- Personal Injury Damages
- Premises Liability
- What To Expect After Filing a Claim
- Types of Personal Injury
- Burn Injuries
- What is a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
- Why Do I Need an Attorney?
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Mediating a Personal Injury Case
- The Victim's Duty to Mitigate Damages
- San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyers
- Preponderance of Evidence
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorneys
- Proving Proximate Cause
- San Antonio Law Firms
- The Thin Skull Rule
- San Antonio Injury Lawyer
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- San Antonio Injury Law Firm
- Vicarious Liability
- Personal Injury Attorneys in San Antonio
- Subrogation
- Personal Injury Lawyers in San Antonio
- San Antonio Injury Lawyers
- Wrongful Death
- Texas Wrongful Death Law Explained
- Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations
- The Benefits of a Wrongful Death Attorney
- Auto Accident Wrongful Death
- Semi Truck Accident Wrongful Death
- Wrongful Deaths on the Job
- Construction Accident Wrongful Death
- Loss of Future Earnings Compensation
- Texas Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Big Rig Accidents
- Texas Truck Accident Attorney
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents
- 18-Wheeler Accident Litigation
- Truck Accident Claims
- Insurance Company Tactics
- Fatal Big Rig Accidents
- Dump Truck Accidents
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Falling Cargo Accidents
- Causes of 18-Wheeler Accidents
- San Antonio 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Truck Accident Lawyers
- San Antonio Truck Accident Attorney
- Unsafe Trucking Practices
- Legal Opposition You Will Face
- Don't Damage Your Case
- Tractor Trailer Accidents
- Texas Truck Accident Lawyer
- San Antonio Truck Accident Firm
- Automobile Accidents
- San Antonio Auto Accident Lawyer
- Common Car Accident Injuries
- How To File an Accident Injury Claim
- San Antonio Car Accident Lawyer
- Child Injuries in a Car Accident
- Passenger Injuries
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance
- Proportionate Responsibility
- Tire Defect Accidents
- Rollover Accidents
- The Benefit of Hiring An Attorney
- Challenges Recovering Compensation
- Auto Accident Attorney in San Antonio
- San Antonio Accident Injury Lawyer
- The Legal Opposition You Will Face
- Uninsured Motorist Accidents
- San Antonio Accident Attorney
- What To Do After an Accident
- San Antonio Car Wreck Lawyer
- Work Related Accidents
- Construction Accidents
- Drunk Driver Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Dangerous & Defective Products
- Drowning Accidents
- Day Care Abuse
- Medical Malpractice
- What is Medical Malpractice?
- Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim
- Malpractice Claims & Litigation Process
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect
- Misdiagnosis & Faulure to Diagnose
- Pharmacy & Prescription Errors
- Surgical Errors & Mistakes
- Nursing Malpractice
- Birth Injury
- Rest Home Abuse
- The Informed Consent Document
- Birth Injury Malpractice
- Drug & Pharmacy Injuries
- Personal Injury
- Our Attorneys
- Success Stories
- Information Center
- Contact
It was pretty easy. Whatever I needed, they were there. I'm happy. I'm glad. I'm satisfied. [If someone I knew was ever injured] I would say, 'Hey, go with Grossman!'
-
J. Fernandez
Automobile Accident Case
Damages in a Personal Injury
San Antonio Personal Injury Attorney Michael Grossman Discusses Damages in a Personal Injury Lawsuit
If you or someone you love has been hurt in an accident, you may attempt to seek compensation for your injuries through a personal injury lawsuit.
The value of this lawsuit will ultimately depend on the amount of damages you have accrued in the accident. In legal terms, “damages” refers to the amount of money that a plaintiff receives from the defendant (or the defendant’s insurance company) due to injuries sustained in an accident caused by the defendant. In the state of Texas, there are two broad categories for damages: special damages and general damages.
Special Damages
This category is the most straightforward, as it refers to damages that have an explicit monetary value associated with them. A few examples of special damages (also called economic damages) include:
- Past and future medical bills
- Repair or replacement costs for a victim’s property
- Court and legal fees
- Wages lost from time spent away from work
- Lost potential income or earning capacity
Most of these damages are relatively straightforward, though lost potential income requires some explanation. As an example, let us say that a plaintiff loses his hand in an industrial accident. The plaintiff was previously employed on a factory floor and was making approximately $55,000 per year. Since the plaintiff no longer has his hand, he cannot effectively perform his chosen profession any longer. Therefore, he is entitled to compensation for his lost potential income. If we assume that the plaintiff would have continued working for another 30 years before retiring, then the plaintiff would be entitled to approximately $1.7 million in lost earning capacity damages alone.
General Damages
These damages are more subjective and cannot be directly assigned a monetary value. The value of these damages is calculated on a case-by-case basis and depends on a number of different factors. Some examples of special damages are:
- Physical pain and suffering
- Mental or emotional anguish
- Physical impairment
- Disfigurement
- Loss of consortium
- Inconvenience
- Damage to a victim’s reputation
As you can imagine, assigning a monetary value to these types of injuries is not easy, especially considering how differently they affect different people. For example, consider a theoretical construction accident. Two workers are injured in a building collapse. Their injuries are almost identical, the cost of their medical treatment is the same, and they both lost an equal amount of wages. Their special damages would be virtually identical in value. But let us say that victim A was knocked unconscious in the accident, while victim B was conscious virtually the entire time, and had to experience the pain associated with his injuries. Victim B would therefore be entitled to compensation for the suffering he endured, whereas victim A, who was unconscious, would not.
As another example, consider a plaintiff injured in a car accident. In the accident, the plaintiff receives an unsightly facial scar. If the plaintiff is a 50-year-old lumberjack, he may not be very concerned about a small facial scar, and so he would likely not receive much compensation for it (despite receiving full compensation for the rest of his injuries). But if the plaintiff is a 22-year-old model, then his or her life could be greatly altered by a small facial scar. The scar would effectively cause much more damage to the model’s life, and so he or she would be entitled to a large amount of compensation for the same injury.
As you can see, calculating the true costs of an accident is a complex process. But experienced San Antonio personal injury lawyer Michael Grossman know how to properly account for and document all the injuries a victim receives in an accident. Our firm is dedicated to making sure that you are compensated for the full extent of your injuries. We have twenty years of experience helping people seek compensation through personal injury lawsuits, and we have faced every major insurance carrier in the country. In many cases, we can secure a fair settlement without taking a case to court, simply because insurance companies know who we are and they do not want to face us in trial. The bottom line is that our attorneys will fight aggressively to defend your rights and ensure that you are fully compensated. So if you or a loved one has been hurt in an accident, contact San Antonio personal injury attorney Michael Grossman from Grossman Law Offices today, and make sure you receive the settlement you deserve.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$350,000.00 Recovery - Premises Liability (Brain Injury)
Our attorneys sued an apartment complex in relation to a brain injury sustained by a toddler when he fell through a balcony railing. The apartment complex denied liability, asserted that their railings were in spec at the time of the building's construction (some 20 years prior), and they claimed that the child's mother was contributorily negligent in that she did not notice that her child was playing near the railing.
Through litigation, our attorneys countered the defendant's arguments by showing that the case law does not support the notion of any safety related concerns in the building code being "grandfathered" in. On the contrary, a property owner has an obligation to keep safety features such as balcony railings within the specs at all times. The railings in this complex were spaced at 7 inch intervals, which was at odds with the now-standard 4 inch interval.
Additionally, our attorneys countered the claims of contributory negligence as a practical matter in that the mother was indeed monitoring the child's activity and the child literally ran up to the railing and immediately fell through the rails. Alternatively, we argued that the doctrine of parental immunity applied and that the contributory negligence, if any such negligence ever even occurred, of the mother would not be admissible. The case was satisfactorily resolved through litigation.
Our attorneys sued an apartment complex in relation to a brain injury sustained by a toddler when he fell through a balcony railing. The apartment complex denied liability, asserted that their railings were in spec at the time of the building's construction (some 20 years prior), and they claimed that the child's mother was contributorily negligent in that she did not notice that her child was playing near the railing.
Through litigation, our attorneys countered the defendant's arguments by showing that the case law does not support the notion of any safety related concerns in the building code being "grandfathered" in. On the contrary, a property owner has an obligation to keep safety features such as balcony railings within the specs at all times. The railings in this complex were spaced at 7 inch intervals, which was at odds with the now-standard 4 inch interval.
Additionally, our attorneys countered the claims of contributory negligence as a practical matter in that the mother was indeed monitoring the child's activity and the child literally ran up to the railing and immediately fell through the rails. Alternatively, we argued that the doctrine of parental immunity applied and that the contributory negligence, if any such negligence ever even occurred, of the mother would not be admissible. The case was satisfactorily resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$115,500.00
$115,500.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
A delivery driver hired our firm to pursue a negligent trucking company following a collision with insecure cargo. Our client was driving his work vehicle when numerous large metal pipes fell from the back of a flatbed trailer onto the roadway. Our client took evasive action but was unable to avoid the debris, which resulted in a fairly severe accident. As a result, our client sustained lower back injuries including two herniated discs which required surgery to correct. The defendants conceded liability early on but would not make a reasonable settlement offer. As such, suit was filed and the case was ultimately successfully resolved through litigation.
A delivery driver hired our firm to pursue a negligent trucking company following a collision with insecure cargo. Our client was driving his work vehicle when numerous large metal pipes fell from the back of a flatbed trailer onto the roadway. Our client took evasive action but was unable to avoid the debris, which resulted in a fairly severe accident. As a result, our client sustained lower back injuries including two herniated discs which required surgery to correct. The defendants conceded liability early on but would not make a reasonable settlement offer. As such, suit was filed and the case was ultimately successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$120,000.00
$120,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$180,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries and Labor Complications)
Recovery for pregnant car accident victim who suffered a premature delivery and soft tissue injuries.
Recovery for pregnant car accident victim who suffered a premature delivery and soft tissue injuries.
Total Recovery:
$180,000.00
$180,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$38,333.00
$38,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$138.00
$138.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Premises Liability Accident (Contusions & Sprained Ankle)
Recovery for client who sustained contusions and a sprained ankle in a premises liability accident.
Recovery for client who sustained contusions and a sprained ankle in a premises liability accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$37,272.00
$37,272.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,730.00
$1,730.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Neck, Back, and Knee Injury)
Recovery for a client who suffered neck, back, and knee injuries in a motor cycle accident.
Recovery for a client who suffered neck, back, and knee injuries in a motor cycle accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,333.00
$33,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$627.00
$627.00
$125,055.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Recovery for client who suffered a back injury resulting in surgery in a car accident.
Recovery for client who suffered a back injury resulting in surgery in a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$125,055.00
$125,055.00
Attorney Fees:
$41,684.00
$41,684.00
Litigation Expenses:
$435.00
$435.00
$1,450,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Brain Injury)
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Total Recovery:
$1,450,000.00
$1,450,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$560,000.00
$560,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$31,410.00
$31,410.00
$350,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our client, a middle-aged woman, was injured when an 18-wheeler rear-ended her vehicle. As a consequence of the wreck, she sustained a back injury which required surgery to remedy. Naturally, the defendants denied liability and argued that the accident was unavoidable. Our attorneys filed suit. The defendant driver initially claimed that our client suddenly changed lanes in front of his tractor-trailer and then inexplicably slammed onto her brakes. When confronted with eye-witness testimony and other physical evidence that reflected an entirely different scenario, the truck driver ultimately recanted. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Our client, a middle-aged woman, was injured when an 18-wheeler rear-ended her vehicle. As a consequence of the wreck, she sustained a back injury which required surgery to remedy. Naturally, the defendants denied liability and argued that the accident was unavoidable. Our attorneys filed suit. The defendant driver initially claimed that our client suddenly changed lanes in front of his tractor-trailer and then inexplicably slammed onto her brakes. When confronted with eye-witness testimony and other physical evidence that reflected an entirely different scenario, the truck driver ultimately recanted. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$140,000.00
$140,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$8,188.00
$8,188.00
$50,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Concussion)
Recovery for worker who fell from the back of a pickup truck and suffered a concussion.
Recovery for worker who fell from the back of a pickup truck and suffered a concussion.
Total Recovery:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$348.00
$348.00
$1,010,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Hand Lacerations)
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
Total Recovery:
$1,010,000.00
$1,010,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$333,300.00
$333,300.00
Litigation Expenses:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00



