- Home
- All Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- What is Personal Injury?
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
- Can I Handle My Own Case?
- How Personal Injury Claims Work
- How Our Attorneys Can Help
- Denied Insurance Claims
- Personal Injury Damages
- Premises Liability
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorney
- Types of Personal Injury
- Burn Injuries
- What is a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
- San Antonio Injury Attorney
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Mediating a Personal Injury Case
- The Victim's Duty to Mitigate Damages
- San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyers
- Preponderance of Evidence
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorneys
- Proving Proximate Cause
- San Antonio Law Firms
- The Thin Skull Rule
- San Antonio Injury Lawyer
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- San Antonio Injury Law Firm
- Vicarious Liability
- Personal Injury Attorneys in San Antonio
- Subrogation
- Personal Injury Lawyers in San Antonio
- San Antonio Injury Lawyers
- New Braunfels Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death
- Texas Wrongful Death Law Explained
- Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations
- The Benefits of a Wrongful Death Attorney
- Auto Accident Wrongful Death
- Semi Truck Accident Wrongful Death
- Wrongful Deaths on the Job
- Construction Accident Wrongful Death
- Loss of Future Earnings Compensation
- Texas Wrongful Death Lawyer
- New Braunfels Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Big Rig Accidents
- Texas Truck Accident Attorney
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents
- 18-Wheeler Accident Litigation
- Truck Accident Claims
- Insurance Company Tactics
- Fatal Big Rig Accidents
- Dump Truck Accidents
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Falling Cargo Accidents
- Causes of 18-Wheeler Accidents
- San Antonio 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Truck Accident Lawyers
- San Antonio Truck Accident Attorney
- Unsafe Trucking Practices
- San Antonio Trucking Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Texas Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Texas Truck Accident Lawyer
- San Antonio Truck Accident Firm
- New Braunfels 18-Wheeler Attorney
- New Braunfels Truck Accident Lawyer
- Automobile Accidents
- San Antonio Auto Accident Lawyer
- Common Car Accident Injuries
- How To File an Accident Injury Claim
- San Antonio Car Accident Lawyer
- Child Injuries in a Car Accident
- Passenger Injuries
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance
- Proportionate Responsibility
- Tire Defect Accidents
- San Antonio Rollover Accident Attorney
- The Benefit of Hiring An Attorney
- Challenges Recovering Compensation
- Auto Accident Attorney in San Antonio
- San Antonio Accident Injury Lawyer
- San Antonio Auto Injury Attorney
- Uninsured Motorist Accidents
- San Antonio Accident Attorney
- What To Do After an Accident
- San Antonio Car Wreck Lawyer
- New Braunfels Car Accident Lawyer
- Work Related Accidents
- San Antonio Workers' Comp Lawyer
- Workers Comp Vs Non-Subscriber
- Fatal Workplace Accidents
- Gas & Oil Drilling Accidents
- Lifting Injuries While Working
- Non-Subscriber Injury Law
- What To Expect After a Work Injury
- Oilfield Worker Injury Accidents
- San Antonio Workers Compensation Attorney
- New Braunfels Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Drunk Driver Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Dangerous & Defective Products
- Drowning Accidents
- Day Care Abuse
- Medical Malpractice
- What is Medical Malpractice?
- Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim
- Malpractice Claims & Litigation Process
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect
- Misdiagnosis & Faulure to Diagnose
- Pharmacy & Prescription Errors
- Surgical Errors & Mistakes
- Nursing Malpractice
- Dental Malpractice
- Birth Injury
- San Antonio Nursing Home Abuse Attorney
- The Informed Consent Document
- Birth Injury Malpractice
- Drug & Pharmacy Injuries
- Personal Injury
- Our Attorneys
- Success Stories
- Information Center
- Contact
San Antonio Oilfield Injury Attorney
San Antonio Oilfield Accident Lawyer Michael Grossman Discusses West Texas Oilfield Work Injury Accident

Touted as one of the most dangerous of all jobs in the country, the oil and gas industry presents both financial rewards to the worker and very serious safety challenges as well. With the present state of our economy and the need to find employment that will provide their families decent housing and living expenses, the decision to become an oil and gas worker is really an easy one.
To those workers in the oil and gas industry in San Antonio and throughout West Texas, the work is steady, the days are long, and the work requires sufficient physical effort day in and day out. Oil and gas workers often pay the ultimate price with their very lives.
There are those who advocate the use of other forms of energy consumption and more often than not, many of these anti-energy naysayers cite the negative statistics of oil and gas work-related injuries and they often allude to the drilling and production of natural gas as an alternative. However, neither is the oilfield industry without its anti-energy naysayers as they cite the negative aspects of work-related injuries and fatalities directly related to the natural gas industry.
Sometimes when these opposing components get together and verbalize the pros and cons of natural gas vs petroleum, they give us all food for thought. Though natural gas is certainly not yet as easily identifiable a household name as gasoline or petroleum, natural gas can not be denied or discounted in Americaâs ongoing search for alternative sources of clean energy to meet Americaâs growing needs.
Natural gas does have its challenges and when it is released into the air, natural gas is potentially very dangerous. The combined mixture of air and the lowest concentration of combustible natural gas becomes a flammable atmosphere that explodes when there is an ignition source. In addition to natural gas being flammable under the right circumstances, there are also the cuts, bruises, broken bones, and other disabling work-related injuries to include fatalities that occur to workers in the oilfield industry.
The ever-growing need to protect our environment and at the same time the need to combat the growing health concerns directly related to pollutants or toxins in the environment is paramount. The need to find ways to become more independent and use Americaâs resources and become less dependent on foreign oil resources is also paramount as is the need to bring back more jobs to American soil.
No matter whether you are a laborer, a worker on an oil drilling crew, or a deck hand, or an actual driller, or whatever your worker description may be, if you have a work-related injury resulting from an oilfield accident in San Antonio, you may be entitled to financial compensatory recovery. San Antonio Oilfield Accident Attorney, Michael Grossman, or one of his associates will listen to you as you explain your concerns. Attorney Michael Grossman or an associate will then give you the benefit of twenty (20) years of legal experience as you are advised on the legal aspects of your rights.
Noted Oil Rig Working Dangers
Because of the very skittish work environment not to mention the uniqueness of an oil rig workerâs job duties, there is a clear and ever-readiness for danger at most every turn of any workerâs workday. These dangers include but are not limited to:
- The strong possibility of a flashover or an explosion.
- The ever-present and continuing loud drone or hum of an engine or motor that prohibits normal verbal conversation and makes hearing virtually impossible.
- Machines or components of a machine that are not working properly and are not performing as expected.
- Untrained workers who, unknowingly, cause mishaps.
- Exhausted employees working long hours without a break who often find it difficult to focus.
- Loose surveillance and/or guidance over workers who are inexperienced and untrained.
- The failure to regularly check a piece of equipment or mechanism designed to serve a specific purpose.

The potential for danger as listed above can account for a wide array of accidents or injuries to oneself, to ones fellow workers, to oilfield working mechanisms, and to the environment. Frequent oilfield work-related injuries or fatalities include, but are not limited to:
- Lung problems directly related to inhaling poisonous fumes
- A serious abrasion or damage to the outer layer of the skin relative to being in close proximity to combustive materials
- Severed or crushed limb-type injuries directly related to machinery working improperly or the carelessness of a co-worker
- Cranial injuries, i.e., skull or brain trauma resulting from an impact to the head by a falling object or a falling or faulty piece of machinery
- Backbone or spinal cord damage often related to an unusual jump or plunge which can also result from a heavy object or piece of machinery falling and impacting an individualâs back
- Flammable combustion or a sudden and unexpected plunge or possibly resulting from being in close proximity to a nearby oil rig experiencing a serious mishap
When an oilfield work-related mishap happens relative to the failure of another person to use an expected standard of care or caution, as the injured party you have a right to seek legal restitution. San Antonio Oilfield Injury Attorney Michael Grossman will listen to you and with twenty (20) years of experience and much success in the courtroom, he will explain your legal rights and he will suggest a course of action, however, the decision is yours alone to make. Below are some frequently asked questions and answers to and from attorney Michael Grossman.
It Matters If Your Employer Has Workersâ Compensation Insurance
Texas is a unique state in many ways. One of the ways it is unique is if you own and operate a business in Texas, you do not necessarily have to purchase Workersâ Compensation Insurance. For those employers who do choose to purchase Workersâ Compensation Insurance they are known as Subscribers. For those employers who do not choose to purchase Workersâ Compensation Insurance, they are known as Non-Subscribers. The most important feature for a Subscriber to have this type of insurance is one hundred (100) percent protection from being sued by their employees who suffer work-related injuries. If an oilfield employee suffers an on-the-job work-related injury by a Subscriber, he or she should report the incident to the supervisor or foreman in addition to seeking treatment at the on-site clinic or nearby hospital emergency room to have the injury documented. The injured worker must file a workersâ comp claim with their employerâs insurance carrier and detail the series of events that happened just before the injury occurred. Copies of supporting documentation, i.e., the attending physicianâs prognosis if available, doctorâs visits, payments for medications, taxi services to and from doctorâs visits in addition to any other outlay of finances directly related to the injury the worker wishes to be compensated for. Should the Workersâ Comp Claim be denied, the injured worker should contact a competent lawyer who is well-versed and experienced in this area of law in addition to a lawyer who has a proven record of winning in the courtroom. San Antonio Oilfield Injury Attorney, Michael Grossman, is such an attorney. With over twenty (20) years of legal experience, the Law Offices of Michael Grossman and associates will listen to you with an open mind and proceed to give you some good sound legal advice on what your options are.
Employers who are Non-Subscribers take a gamble by not purchasing Texas Workersâ Compensation Insurance. On the surface it might appear that they have left themselves and their company wide-open for countless lawsuits and the possibility of company ruin. However, just because an employer is a Non-Subscriber is no indication that the employer is not insured by some other insurer.
Should that dreaded time come and a Non-Subscriber has an employee who suffers and on-the-job work-related injury or even worseâa fatality, things can quickly go from bad to worse. If it is a work-related injury, the injured worker should report the injury to the supervisor or foreman and seek treatment at the on-site clinic or the nearest hospital emergency room and also to get the incident documented. As soon as possible the injured worker should file a claim with the Non-Subscriber and detail the series of events that happened just prior to the accident or injury. Any an all supporting documentation, i.e., the attending physicianâs prognosis if available, doctorâs visits, payments for medication, taxi services to and from the doctor, and any other related out-of-pockets expenses incurred by the worker as a result of the injury the worker wishes to be compensated for. The Non-Subscriber might offer the injured worker a sum much less than requested and often it is a sum that just barely covers the injured workers outlay of expenses to date. The Non-Subscriber might deny the claim altogether and make no offer at all. When this happens, the injured has no choice but to retain the services of an attorney and sue for compensatory damages. Under Texas law, when the employer is a Non-Subscriber, there is no cap or limitation on the amount of liability the claimant can sue to recover.
Understandably, a Non-Subscriber is more often than not tight-lipped about whether they do or whether they donât have Workersâ Compensation Insurance. The injured worker will desperately seek to get answers from co-workers and even from management only to be told very little that will aid the worker in the recovery process.
There have been times when upon careful investigation, it was determined that not even the injured workerâs supervisor was aware of whether the employer was a Subscriber or Non-Subscriber. Other times the degree to which a blatant and aggressive Non-Subscriber will go to so as to avoid discovery is appalling. Some unethical tactics used by Non-Subscribers to avoid discovery is to threaten or intimidate their managerâs to deny or lie about the companyâs Subscriber or Non-Subscriber status.
Simply explained this means that a Non-Subscribing oilfield company may feign status as a Subscriber because if word is (accidentally, but âpurposelyâ) circulated among the employees of the companyâs feign Subscriber status, the employeeâs know that the employer can not be sued. âFeigningâ the façade of a Subscriber protects the employer from legal liability claims. Often it takes the experience and perseverance of an experienced litigator like San Antonio Oilfield Accident Attorney, Michael Grossman and his team of investigators to uncover the truth and hold liable that employer who will be made to âfess upâ and face the consequences.
Your Rights As a Subscriberâs Employee

If the truth is ascertained and the injured workerâs employer is a Subscriber, the injured worker is at liberty to file for Workerâs Compensation to include all personal outlays of expenses and lost wages due to the injured employeeâs inability to work. Although Workersâ Compensation Insurance is good to have in case of a work-related injury, this plan does have its limitations to compensation. For example, an injured worker is only entitled to a percentage of his or her wages due to lost time from work related to the injury. Furthermore, no matter what the injured workerâs base pay was at the time of the work-related injury, the percentage paid the injured work will not exceed $600 per week. Should worse come to worse and the work-related injury the worker has sustained has rendered the worker permanently disabled and therefore unable to return to work, the $600 per week may very well become the amount the injured worker receives for life.
Many people are of the mistaken impression that filing for workersâ compensation and its process is a piece of cake. The truth is the process is sometimes a long, slow, aggravating, and frustrating one. There are hoops you have to jump through and rivers to cross and guidelines to follow and government red tape to unravel. Contrary to popular opinion, the employerâs insurance carriers are not in business to cover your work injury related losses nor are they in business to hand over large amounts of money in settlements without a fight. Their main reason for being in business is to receive the millions of dollars big companies and the working public regularly sends them for insurance coverage. As long as the premiums payments keep coming in and their profit margins continue to increase, all is well.
However, no matter what the injury or how bad or debilitating it is, there will be a fight because insurance carriers love to manufacture ways--either legally or by straddling the line--and find ways to reduce your claim. Game-playing and bouncing the ball back and forth between the claimant and the insurance carrier can become quite time-consuming and all of this could possibly result in a lengthy lawsuit that might drag on for a long time. When an injured workerâs comp claim is contested he or she can plead their case in what is a workersâ compensation court. It is most important that the injured worker have an experienced courtroom successful and savvy-type of attorney who knows the ins and outs of an Oilfield Injury Law. Experienced San Antonio Oilfield Accident Attorney Michael Grossman is such a litigant who can help you with the financial recovery you deserve. Call the Law Office of attorney Michael Grossman today. The telephone number is 1-855-393-0000 and attorney Michael Grossman and his associates are ready and waiting to advise and help you.
The One Exception to the Rule
An employer who is a Non-Subscriber does appear to leave their company wide-open for numerous lawsuits should an employee suffer a work-related injury. However, because the employer is a Non-Subscriber is not to imply that the employer has no insurance at all. However, should the worse happen and a worker is injured, the only protection the employer/Non-Subscriber has against a lawsuit and possibility of the loss of all company assets is to use the one legal recourse the Non-Subscriber has and that is to prove the employee did not exercise a standard of care to prevent the injury from happening and thus is 100 percent responsible for his or her own personal injury. The employer has to get down and dirty and use all kinds of unethical tactics as he attacks the credibility and the good name of the injured employee. To make certain the court has a chance to hear your side of the story, you need an experienced attorney who is well-seasoned, and courtroom qualified. San Antonio Oilfield Accident Attorney Michael Grossman and his associates have twenty (20) years of litigation experience in the courtroom and they know how to get the job done. Their skillful team of investigators will leave no stone unturned as they see to uncover the truth and give you the financial recovery you deserve. Call today!
âContract Workerâ or âTemporaryâ WorkerâThat is the Question
Employers in the construction industry and places like the oilfields and on oil rigs often employ workers whose status they intentionally list as Contract Worker of Temporary Worker. This is deliberately done to avoid having to pay Workersâ Comp Claims should there be a work-related injury. Under Texas Law, a contractor or Temp worker is responsible for their own safety. An employer knows that legally they do not have to offer the same standard of care to a Contract or Temp worker as they do their regular workers. Consequently, if a work-related accident occurs and employer thinks he should not be held liable. However, there are definite guidelines that prove or disprove whether a Contract or Temp is actually an employee.
If the guidelines prove the âContractâ or âTempâ worker is actually an employee with all the rights and privileges of an employee, then the injured worker has a right to seek Workersâ Compensation recovery.
OSHA
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration or âOSHAâ as it is commonly
Referred to is mainly an understaffed government agency that has too much to do with too few people to do it. If a worker suffers a job-related injury, waste no time in thinking it is âOSHA to the rescueâ because it wonât happen. In fact with OSHA get the mandatory report of a work-related accident, they may or may not physically come to visually inspect the scene of the accident. OSHA will make a report and a recommendation to the employer as a measure of an effort to prevent the same accident from happening again and this is the extent of any support they will render you in your time of need
Contact San Antonio Oilfield Injury Attorney Michael Grossman

Remember, if you or your loved one or someone you know has suffered an injury or if there has been a fatality, during a work-related injury in an oilfield or on an oil rig in San Antonio, you need the legal counsel of a qualified Attorney who is experienced in the specific area of the law.
San Antonio Oilfield Injury Attorney Michael Grossman and his associates for some good sound legal counsel that will help you make in informed decision. Call them today. The number is 1-855-393-0000. The call is toll free and their initial legal consultation is too.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$125,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Closed-Head Injury)
Recovery for injured worker who suffered a closed head injury in a scaffolding accident.
Recovery for injured worker who suffered a closed head injury in a scaffolding accident.
Total Recovery:
$125,000.00
$125,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,135.00
$2,135.00
$300,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident / Work Injury (Facial Fractures and Head Trauma)
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
Total Recovery:
$300,000.00
$300,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$120,000.00
$120,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$9,807.00
$9,807.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$700,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident / Work Injury (Fractured Pelvis, Other Internal Injuries)
A loading dock employee suffered a fractured and damage to internal organs as the result of a crushing injury sustained when an 18-wheeler backed into him and crushed him between the trailer and loading dock.
A loading dock employee suffered a fractured and damage to internal organs as the result of a crushing injury sustained when an 18-wheeler backed into him and crushed him between the trailer and loading dock.
Total Recovery:
$700,000.00
$700,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$175,000.00
$175,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,084.00
$1,084.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Closed-Head Injury)
A painter fell from an apartment balcony resulting in a closed-head injury and other minor bodily injuries. The case was successfully resolved through litigation against the plaintiff's employer and the general contractor.
A painter fell from an apartment balcony resulting in a closed-head injury and other minor bodily injuries. The case was successfully resolved through litigation against the plaintiff's employer and the general contractor.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$20,465.00
$20,465.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workers' Compensation Gross Negligence
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$150,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workplace Accident
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
Total Recovery:
$150,000.00
$150,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$341.00
$341.00
$1,450,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Brain Injury)
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
Total Recovery:
$1,450,000.00
$1,450,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$560,000.00
$560,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$31,410.00
$31,410.00
$226,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Shoulder Injury Requiring Surgery)
Our attorneys were hired by a delivery driver who sustained a serious shoulder injury when a worker for a third party negligently operated a fork lift. The accident occurred as the plaintiff delivered a load of hay bails to a commercial farm.
An employee of said facility attempted to unload the trailer with a forklift. In doing so, he pushed several bales of hay off of the flatbed, over the side opposite the forklift. Consequently, several of the 400 lb (est.) bales of hay struck the plaintiff who was working to disconnect tie downs on the opposite side of the trailer. This resulted in serious injury to the plaintiff's shoulder.
The defendants took an aggressive stance and denied the claim, asserting that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries by virtue of the fact that he was standing in a known dangerous area. Suit was filed soon thereafter. Our attorneys argued that the plaintiff's ordinary work duties, and indeed the normal protocol for all flatbed delivery drivers, consists of letting loose the materials to be unloaded. We maintained that the true cause of the plaintiff's injuries was that the forklift operator rushed into unloading the trailer.
Furthermore, the manner in which he unloaded the trailer was itself a contributing element of the defendant's negligence. The forks that were incorporated into the forklift in question were not compatible with stabbing hay bails; they were ordinary forks that were designed to be positioned below a heavy object that was to be lifted. The case was successfully resolved in mediation.
Our attorneys were hired by a delivery driver who sustained a serious shoulder injury when a worker for a third party negligently operated a fork lift. The accident occurred as the plaintiff delivered a load of hay bails to a commercial farm.
An employee of said facility attempted to unload the trailer with a forklift. In doing so, he pushed several bales of hay off of the flatbed, over the side opposite the forklift. Consequently, several of the 400 lb (est.) bales of hay struck the plaintiff who was working to disconnect tie downs on the opposite side of the trailer. This resulted in serious injury to the plaintiff's shoulder.
The defendants took an aggressive stance and denied the claim, asserting that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries by virtue of the fact that he was standing in a known dangerous area. Suit was filed soon thereafter. Our attorneys argued that the plaintiff's ordinary work duties, and indeed the normal protocol for all flatbed delivery drivers, consists of letting loose the materials to be unloaded. We maintained that the true cause of the plaintiff's injuries was that the forklift operator rushed into unloading the trailer.
Furthermore, the manner in which he unloaded the trailer was itself a contributing element of the defendant's negligence. The forks that were incorporated into the forklift in question were not compatible with stabbing hay bails; they were ordinary forks that were designed to be positioned below a heavy object that was to be lifted. The case was successfully resolved in mediation.
Total Recovery:
$226,000.00
$226,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$84,000.00
$84,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,500.00
$5,500.00
$1,010,000.00 Recovery - Workplace Accident (Hand Lacerations)
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
Total Recovery:
$1,010,000.00
$1,010,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$333,300.00
$333,300.00
Litigation Expenses:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00



