- Home
- All Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- What is Personal Injury?
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
- Can I Handle My Own Case?
- How Personal Injury Claims Work
- How Our Attorneys Can Help
- Denied Insurance Claims
- Personal Injury Damages
- Premises Liability
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorney
- Types of Personal Injury
- Burn Injuries
- What is a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
- San Antonio Injury Attorney
- Can I File an Injury Claim?
- Mediating a Personal Injury Case
- The Victim's Duty to Mitigate Damages
- San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyers
- Preponderance of Evidence
- San Antonio Personal Injury Attorneys
- Proving Proximate Cause
- San Antonio Law Firms
- The Thin Skull Rule
- San Antonio Injury Lawyer
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- San Antonio Injury Law Firm
- Vicarious Liability
- Personal Injury Attorneys in San Antonio
- Subrogation
- Personal Injury Lawyers in San Antonio
- San Antonio Injury Lawyers
- New Braunfels Personal Injury Attorney
- Wrongful Death
- Texas Wrongful Death Law Explained
- Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations
- The Benefits of a Wrongful Death Attorney
- Auto Accident Wrongful Death
- Semi Truck Accident Wrongful Death
- Wrongful Deaths on the Job
- Construction Accident Wrongful Death
- Loss of Future Earnings Compensation
- Texas Wrongful Death Lawyer
- New Braunfels Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Big Rig Accidents
- Texas Truck Accident Attorney
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents
- 18-Wheeler Accident Litigation
- Truck Accident Claims
- Insurance Company Tactics
- Fatal Big Rig Accidents
- Dump Truck Accidents
- Flatbed Trailer Accidents
- Falling Cargo Accidents
- Causes of 18-Wheeler Accidents
- San Antonio 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Truck Accident Lawyers
- San Antonio Truck Accident Attorney
- Unsafe Trucking Practices
- San Antonio Trucking Accident Attorney
- San Antonio Texas Trucking Accident Lawyer
- Tractor Trailer Accident Attorney
- Texas Truck Accident Lawyer
- San Antonio Truck Accident Firm
- New Braunfels 18-Wheeler Attorney
- New Braunfels Truck Accident Lawyer
- Automobile Accidents
- San Antonio Auto Accident Lawyer
- Common Car Accident Injuries
- How To File an Accident Injury Claim
- San Antonio Car Accident Lawyer
- Child Injuries in a Car Accident
- Passenger Injuries
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance
- Proportionate Responsibility
- Tire Defect Accidents
- San Antonio Rollover Accident Attorney
- The Benefit of Hiring An Attorney
- Challenges Recovering Compensation
- Auto Accident Attorney in San Antonio
- San Antonio Accident Injury Lawyer
- San Antonio Auto Injury Attorney
- Uninsured Motorist Accidents
- San Antonio Accident Attorney
- What To Do After an Accident
- San Antonio Car Wreck Lawyer
- New Braunfels Car Accident Lawyer
- Work Related Accidents
- San Antonio Workers' Comp Lawyer
- Workers Comp Vs Non-Subscriber
- Fatal Workplace Accidents
- Gas & Oil Drilling Accidents
- Lifting Injuries While Working
- Non-Subscriber Injury Law
- What To Expect After a Work Injury
- Oilfield Worker Injury Accidents
- San Antonio Workers Compensation Attorney
- New Braunfels Work Injury Lawyer
- Construction Accidents
- Drunk Driver Accidents
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Dangerous & Defective Products
- Drowning Accidents
- Day Care Abuse
- Medical Malpractice
- What is Medical Malpractice?
- Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim
- Malpractice Claims & Litigation Process
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect
- Misdiagnosis & Faulure to Diagnose
- Pharmacy & Prescription Errors
- Surgical Errors & Mistakes
- Nursing Malpractice
- Dental Malpractice
- Birth Injury
- San Antonio Nursing Home Abuse Attorney
- The Informed Consent Document
- Birth Injury Malpractice
- Drug & Pharmacy Injuries
- Personal Injury
- Our Attorneys
- Success Stories
- Information Center
- Contact
On-The-Job Wrongful Deaths
San Antonio Wrongful Death Attorney Michael Grossman Discusses Fatal Workplace Accidents

Losing someone you love in a fatal work accident is a devastating experience, and many families of such victims wish to seek justice by filing a wrongful death lawsuit. However, many people do not know whether or not they need the help of a wrongful death attorney.
The truth is that work accident law is extremely complex. Employers have many strategies they can use to get off the hook and avoid compensation you and your family for your loved one’s death. Someone without extensive legal experience has virtually no chance of success filing this lawsuit alone. But experienced San Antonio fatal work accident attorney Michael Grossman from Grossman Law Offices is here to help you. He has over twenty years of experienced investigating fatal work accidents and helping families seek justice. He can answer any questions you might have about a wrongful death lawsuit, and he can help you bring those responsible for your family member’s death to justice.
Different Kinds of Fatal Work Accidents
Fatal work accidents can result from almost any sort of work-related accident, including:
- Construction accidents
- Industrial accidents
- Pipeline and oilfield explosions
- Motor vehicle accidents (either caused by other workers or passing motorists)
- Slip and fall accidents
- On the job shootings or assaults
In virtually every type of work accident, the injured employee or the family of a deceased employee can seek compensation through a lawsuit or workers’ compensation insurance. However, this is almost never an easy process. A number of different factors can affect how you file your claim and even the level of compensation to which you are entitled. You must determine whether or not your family member’s employer is protected by workers’ compensation insurance, whether your loved one was a general employee or a contractor from a legal standpoint, and, perhaps most importantly, whether or not the employer was grossly negligent. Your options depend on these and many more variables, and a specific legal strategy must be developed that suits your needs. As you can see, these lawsuits are complex, and they should be handled only by experienced work accident attorneys.
What Makes Fatal Work Accident Lawsuits so Complex and Technical?
One of the biggest challenges you will face when filing a work-related wrongful death lawsuit is workers’ compensation. Essentially, workers’ compensation is a form of insurance that guarantees a minimum amount of compensation to an injured worker or a deceased worker’s family; however, workers’ compensation insurance also makes an employer immune to almost all lawsuits filed by injured workers or their families. Workers’ compensation insurance resulted from a massive amount of pro-business lobbying in the state legislature. However, an experienced Texas fatal work accident attorney can help you overcome these difficulties and seek the justice you deserve.
What is the Difference Between Standard Negligence and Gross Negligence, and How Does This Affect my Lawsuit?
There are generally two types of negligence that we consider when we look at a fatal work accident case: standard negligence and gross negligence. In cases where your loved one’s former employer does not subscribe to a Texas workers’ compensation insurance policy, then you need to only prove negligence in order to receive compensation. However, if the defendant does subscribe to workers’ compensation insurance, then you will be held to a higher standard of proof: you must prove gross negligence. In order to prove gross negligence, you essentially need a bulletproof case. Even attorneys without extensive experience often make a small mistake that lets a defendant off the hook and leaves their clients with nothing. However, the legal professionals at Grossman Law Offices have twenty years of experience with fatal work accident lawsuits, and we know how to build a completely comprehensive case that can prove gross negligence and bring those responsible to justice.

The difference between these two forms of negligence is this: standard negligence constitutes a temporary lapse in judgment or a mistake, whereas gross negligence constitutes a reckless and wanton disregard for a worker’s safety and well-being. As an example, if a worker using a nail gun accident slips and a nail ricochets, hitting another worker, the worker using the nail gun is likely guilty of standard negligence. But if the worker using the nail gun has had three similar incidents in the past and the worker chooses to keep using a nail gun, the worker would probably be guilty of standard negligence. In this case, gross negligence would be dependent on the fact that the worker knew that he or she could not safely operate a nail gun, and yet the worker decided to use one anyway. The accident was foreseeable and likely, and yet the worker did not take steps to prevent it. This is gross negligence.
For another example, consider traffic accidents. Let us say that a driver takes his eyes off the road to adjust the radio, and while not paying attention, crashes into another car. The inattentive driver committed an act of negligence. He had a momentary lapse in judgment that caused an accident. However, if a drunk driver is street racing another car and crashes into a pedestrian, that driver would be guilty of gross negligence. The driver knew that driving drunk and street racing could easily cause an accident, and yet the driver chose to drive drunk and street race anyway.
One more example: if an oil pipeline explodes due to some sort of freak incident that was not predicted beforehand, and everyone at the oil rig was operating using standard safety protocol, then the employers would likely only be guilty of standard negligence. However, if workers at the rig had warned employers numerous times about the safety risks associated with the operating procedures at the oil rig and the employers chose to ignore those warnings, then the employers would likely be guilty of gross negligence.
Let Attorney Michael Grossman Help You
Proving that an employer was grossly negligent is not a simple task. These cases typically require extensive investigations of the accident scene and numerous witness testimonies from other workers, other people at the scene, or experts in the relevant industry. While your attorney is investigating the accident, the employer will have a team of defense attorneys and insurance adjusters building a case against your loved one. Their tactics will be unique in that they do not have to prove that the employer was not negligent. On the contrary, they can admit wholeheartedly to negligence, so long as they can prove that the employer was not grossly negligent. If you do not have an aggressive attorney who can prove gross negligence, you will not receive the compensation you deserve.
The legal professionals at Grossman Law Offices want to make sure that this does not happen to you. Every time we accept a fatal work accident case, we conduct a thorough investigation of the accident scene, and we secure all the witnesses relevant to the accident. We know how to secure the evidence necessary to validate your claim. We also file claims against any responsible third parties. We will do everything we can to bring every party responsible for your loss to justice.
Our attorneys have been helping families seek justice for over twenty years. We have experience negotiating with insurance adjusters and convincing juries of the validity of our clients’ claims. We have successfully investigated and litigated hundreds of high-profile cases against every major insurance carrier in the country. Their adjusters know who we are, and they often offer our clients large settlements once they realize that we are on your case, simply because they do not want to face our attorneys in court. So if you have lost someone you love in a fatal work accident, do not let those responsible go unpunished. Contact San Antonio wrongful death attorney Michael Grossman from Grossman Law Offices today for a free consultation. Let us help you bring those responsible for your family member’s death to justice.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$100,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death/ Medical Malpractice
(policy limits) Recovery for wrongful death/ nursing home negligence which resulted in bed sores which became infected.
(policy limits) Recovery for wrongful death/ nursing home negligence which resulted in bed sores which became infected.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,133.00
$33,133.00
Litigation Expenses:
$400.00
$400.00
$1,000,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death/ Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A husband and father of three was killed when the driver of an 18-wheeler veered into oncoming traffic, striking the young man's vehicle and several others. The defendant was employed by a small construction company that operated only a single 18-wheeler. As such, the defendants were largely underinsured and were not financially solvent.
Furthermore, the defendants had an eroding insurance policy and numerous other parties were intent upon filing claims of their own since the 18-wheeler struck multiple other vehicles. This created the need for an aggressive and rapid response before the other claimants could erode the policy.
Defense counsel made it clear that they wished to litigate the case despite the insurmountable liability arguments that our attorneys presented. They intended to designate a third party as a responsible defendant since the accident happened in a construction zone, even though it was abundantly clear that the construction zone played no role in the crash.
Additonally, the defendants made it clear that they wished to downplay the extent of the damages by virtue of a character assasination on the decedent. Fortunately for our clients, our firm has successfully litigated against the defendant's insurer in nearly a dozen cases, so the carrier was quite aware of our courtroom capabilities. We presented a sample lawsuit to the defendant's insurance carrier and informed them that the lawsuit was to be filed the moment that they refused to settle.
Additionally, our attorneys submitted a Stowers' Demand with a brief window of time for the defendants to respond. We made it abundantly clear that we intended to seek punitive damages and that we would assert the full limits of the carrier's exposure under the Stowers' Demand should the carrier not offer policy limits.
The defendant's attorney adamantly persuaded the carrier to litigate, however, our attorney's threats of litigation, past track record, and incredibly aggressive pre-litigation actions convinced the insurance carrier to disregard their own attorney's advice and to settle the case, lest they face our attorneys in court.
Had our clients been represented by virtually any other firm who did not have our specific track record or who would have not recognized that this case required special and immediate attention coupled with an abnormally aggressive stance, the client's would have certainly been tied up in litigation for years, with the limited supply of funds rapidly depleting since the other claimants who did not need to litigate would have essentially had right of first refusal.
(policy limits) A husband and father of three was killed when the driver of an 18-wheeler veered into oncoming traffic, striking the young man's vehicle and several others. The defendant was employed by a small construction company that operated only a single 18-wheeler. As such, the defendants were largely underinsured and were not financially solvent.
Furthermore, the defendants had an eroding insurance policy and numerous other parties were intent upon filing claims of their own since the 18-wheeler struck multiple other vehicles. This created the need for an aggressive and rapid response before the other claimants could erode the policy.
Defense counsel made it clear that they wished to litigate the case despite the insurmountable liability arguments that our attorneys presented. They intended to designate a third party as a responsible defendant since the accident happened in a construction zone, even though it was abundantly clear that the construction zone played no role in the crash.
Additonally, the defendants made it clear that they wished to downplay the extent of the damages by virtue of a character assasination on the decedent. Fortunately for our clients, our firm has successfully litigated against the defendant's insurer in nearly a dozen cases, so the carrier was quite aware of our courtroom capabilities. We presented a sample lawsuit to the defendant's insurance carrier and informed them that the lawsuit was to be filed the moment that they refused to settle.
Additionally, our attorneys submitted a Stowers' Demand with a brief window of time for the defendants to respond. We made it abundantly clear that we intended to seek punitive damages and that we would assert the full limits of the carrier's exposure under the Stowers' Demand should the carrier not offer policy limits.
The defendant's attorney adamantly persuaded the carrier to litigate, however, our attorney's threats of litigation, past track record, and incredibly aggressive pre-litigation actions convinced the insurance carrier to disregard their own attorney's advice and to settle the case, lest they face our attorneys in court.
Had our clients been represented by virtually any other firm who did not have our specific track record or who would have not recognized that this case required special and immediate attention coupled with an abnormally aggressive stance, the client's would have certainly been tied up in litigation for years, with the limited supply of funds rapidly depleting since the other claimants who did not need to litigate would have essentially had right of first refusal.
Total Recovery:
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$333,333.00
$333,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
Confidential Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Total Recovery:
Confidential
Confidential
Attorney Fees:
Confidential
Confidential
Litigation Expenses:
Confidential
Confidential
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.
Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.
Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
Our attorneys were hired to investigate a fatal motor vehicle accident involving an 18-wheeler that claimed the lives of several men, the family of one in particular which our firm represented, felt that the official version of events as outlined in the police report was not an accurate portrayal of the facts and circumstances of the collision.
Our firm launched an investigation, the findings of which served as the basis for a subsequent lawsuit. We were able to determine that the defendant's accusations of contributory negligence on behalf of he driver of the vehicle did appear to be valid and plaintiffs conceded as much. However, the plaintiffs were adamant that the contributory negligence did not entirely overshadow the negligence on behalf of the defendant truck driver.
Through physical evidence and an admission of liability that our attorneys were able to importune from the defendant under oath, we were able to show that the defendant had indeed pulled into the path of the decedent's vehicle, which was of consequence irrespective of the decedent's own contributory negligence, and that icontact.com
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$82,500.00
$82,500.00
Litigation Expenses:
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$95,035.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Automobile Accident
Recovery for the father of a young man who was killed in a car accident.
Recovery for the father of a young man who was killed in a car accident.
Total Recovery:
$95,035.00
$95,035.00
Attorney Fees:
$31,678.00
$31,678.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25.00
$25.00
$97,500.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First-Party Dram Shop Accident
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
(policy limits were $100k) Recovery for wife of a motorcyclist who was killed in a drunk driving accident.
Total Recovery:
$97,500.00
$97,500.00
Attorney Fees:
$48,750.00
$48,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$0.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / First Party Dram Shop
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
A young woman lost her life after a bar over served her to more than three times the legal limit resulting in her burning to death in a single-vehicle accident. Witnesses stated that she was so intoxicated that she could barely make it to her vehicle without assistance. Through litigation, our attorneys ascertained the necessary evidence to prove that the establishment provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person, thus resulting in her ultimate demise.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$150,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workplace Accident
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
Total Recovery:
$150,000.00
$150,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$341.00
$341.00
$550,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Workers' Compensation Gross Negligence
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
(policy limits) A father of two was killed on the job when he fell from a personnel platform atop an elevated piece of machinery. The defendant was initially afforded protection from a liability suit by virtue of their workers' comp policy. Upon thorough investigation, it became evident that gross negligence was at the root of the accident, and suit was filed accordingly. A successful outcome was obtained through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$550,000.00
$550,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$220,000.00
$220,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$400,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Medical Malpractice
A young handicapped woman lost her life when a long-term care facility failed to provide her with treatment for obvious symptoms of severe illness. The defendants maintained that there were no outwardly visible signs of illness. The medical evidence showed otherwise. The case was successfully resolved through litigation, though damages caps imposed by tort reform were a factor.
A young handicapped woman lost her life when a long-term care facility failed to provide her with treatment for obvious symptoms of severe illness. The defendants maintained that there were no outwardly visible signs of illness. The medical evidence showed otherwise. The case was successfully resolved through litigation, though damages caps imposed by tort reform were a factor.
Total Recovery:
$400,000.00
$400,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$132,000.00
$132,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$25,000.00
$25,000.00



